>>1256241
they corrected with "had"
but...no coincidences
why the choice??? odd tweet, don't like the implications
Q
Assurance that Assange is safe?
guess they saw message received
definitely witnessed, no screenshot though..tried retweeting but poof
possible Assange has a way to communicate via WikiLeaks right now, some of the posts are his (I know they shut off his comms, but maybe he is getting msg out)