>>12569937

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'.3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

>>12570394

P is Payseur

>>12570387

Haberman may never accept Trump's win.

>>12570271

>Trump may have listened to him

hahahaha,no.

>>12570491

4am talking points from MOS have been shut down?

>>12570494

Funny how you aren't arguing or refuting Anon's research on Pompeo's most recent tweets and their connection to Q drops.

Instead you try to distract with MUHJOO memes.

Never refuting, always distracting.

>>12570529

He sounds very confident with his assessment.