Who is the real CJ? Regardless, it's questionable because this one is equating Trump with trouble by way of associating and ANON comment to a PATTERN ultimately SOURCED BY Q.

Hmmmmmmm

Did POTUS time his tweets to Q or Anon?

Did Q 'use' a piece of information noticed by an Anon to set up timing between Q drop and POTUS not 'Anon' (because cannot be identified by design, Q had trip code…I'm still not sure how the aggregator sites are knowing the first definitely 'Anonymous' MARKED posts to even know to say that 'THESE ARE Q'?

IP address signatures as information that tried to be covered up during the guccifer 2.0 macguffin story where the world found out technology exists to put digital 'fingerprints' to make it seem like it was sourced from where it wasn't in fact sourced.

There is no 'Qanon'.

Anyone claiming to be associated insiders of Q must show trip code for informational security considerations in a seemingly ready made digital battlefield of truth being suppressed and lies being amplified by the same patterned information sources that are sinisterly intimidating the population to 'accept an untrue narrative as true (Biden didn't cheat is the truth that big tech s trying to suppress), do not speak of this, or we will cancel you/suspend ou/ban you' psychosis, so if you'll excuse if you'll pardon me, PERMIT ME to speak what I believe about my own self certainly more than those accusing me of what I know in my mind and heart of hearts I didn't do, that this time, it was the accuser who did something similar themselves despite their persistent accusations against people by the method of 'suggesting' good or bad in race, religion, sex, class, political affiliation…digital warriors also form alongside and in counter to, at the individual pixel level, the corrupted code that is like a bot or AI miscalculating because it does not place any real reality on individual people as the cause for why you or anyone else is doing or thinking about anything?

With a patterned accusation against people by some class forming demand from all the individual ANONS that the only 'truthfully perceived' cause for why they think or do anything is to further the interests of people divided by race, religion, etc, where individuals who don't exist according to those groups in conflict but a trusting of deceptive loud narrative of logically inevitable false accusation by attributing what 'the real truth' is about another's guilt or innocence?

I know when I am innocent to a false accusation that targets but a tiny piece of the true potential me that in fact unites me with others.

Anons who see themselves falsely accused never forget the source.

Strange to claim using 'suggestion' that you're somehow guilty just because you might speak in terms of one or more of the 'group' 'approved' narrative.

False accusations when they occur, that's the source of divisive code in the information space