Anonymous ID: b14222 Jan. 17, 2021, 10:18 p.m. No.12579401   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9431

>>12579359

Telegram users cannot be final source on differentiating real from not real telegram account holders.

 

There always has to chain of custody in the information transfer nodes.

 

Lin Wood's twitter contained information on what names he's going to use but Twitter deleted his account. Convenient.

 

No anon, you can't cite two telegram account names as the sole source of Telegram information security and accuracy.

Anonymous ID: b14222 Jan. 17, 2021, 10:40 p.m. No.12579591   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9612

>>12579527

>then POTUS was in on it.

No, POTUS is 100% insulated. Military asked Trump to rub for President.

There can be pre-arranged agreed/negotiated information 'firewalls' that naturally arise when there is a timing difference of when who knows what about something or some information.

 

Like a 'blind trust' investment account.

 

POTUS can agree to RECEIVE certain intelligence at preโ€“arranged points in time.

 

This is not illegal or wrong. especially when it is being practised to escape anticipated false accusations of who knew what and when.