>Our Birth Certificates issued under Maritime Law Edition
Shill baker detected.
>Biden cannot be sworn in.
Sure he can. Remember that fraud didn't win him the election… State legislatures choosing to support him won him the election. They are free agents. They may ignore the will of the voters if they so choose. And that's exactly what they did.
It's bullshit. But it's legal and constitutional.
>To be clear, what I mean by that is the only path after swearing in Biden would be an insurrection by patriots.
>To avoid that from happening, Biden cannot be allowed to be sworn in.
I agree with you on the first point, assuming that by "patriots" you mean Q and his military ilk and not a bunch of civilian morons with ARs.
But on the second point, I suspect an insurrection by the above patriots minutes or hours after Biden is sworn in is an absolutely necessary part of the plan. How else can the military tribunals be made to work?
>Even if he's removed, it'll go down HIS line of succession.
If he is removed by a military coup (no pretense of legality or constitutional legitimacy, just goons with guns who think might-makes-right) then all bets are off. If they decide to break the rules then there are no rules until they choose to hand power back to a new civilian government.
>optics for post sworn-in arrest are bad
Bad for whom? Not Trump. He'll be on a golf course somewhere.
Agreed. But I don't see any legal pathway from this point. That leaves only the "alegal" pathways.
>Everyone involved in the swearing in is under indictment that gets unsealed on the 19th…. Instead of an action adventure movie with shootouts, there's crickets at the inauguration. What then?
Why wouldn't they and their news media simply pretend it doesn't exist and then properly memory-hole it a day later?
I can't fathom why anyone would.
This is my vision for it.
The level of support in Congress to impeach and convict a President is pretty close to what is required to pass a constitutional amendment. If a court decides that a past president cannot be impeached than that can and will be promptly fixed.
She may have the option to decline. I dunno.
I don't think it's instantaneous and automatic. There may be brief periods when the US doesn't have a president.
>Impeachment literally means to remove from office.
Impeachment is only a rebuke and the equivalent of an indictment. Removal requires conviction in the Senate. Trump has been impeached twice but never removed.
>When Potus announced the evoking of the insurrection act, no one can change out the current President.
That doesn't seem to be part of it.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/254
Pastebin is the thinnest sauce imaginable. One step up from divination.
>Didn't Potus sign an EO Dec 29, 2017 essentially putting the nation under martial law?
Putting that aside for a moment..
>No change of office when under that EO for martial law.
According to what? An EO cannot override the constitution.