I think it's symbolic, anon. I think he's speaking to a lot of people that are pissed–about what Hannity calls the "two-tier" system of Justice, about activist judges, about California, etc. A lot of these people are quietly pissed, but don't talk about it at work. They come home, turn on the news, and wonder what the hell happened.
So I don't think this is the happening, I think it's priming the barrel.
That was probably expected. I think that's one of the reasons why the court cases are so important–the process of discovery is much more powerful than a FOIA request.
Have you looked in the Memes folders? There's about twenty of them now. They're not really well organized, but Q was covering the Clinton Foundation / Haiti connection in December and onward–just look for the folders from around that time.
Can I point something out to anons? (thanks for the post, btw)
There doesn't need to be a negotiation. There was never a need for a negotiation. That's something that people have been convinced of through the media.
The only thing that there ever needed to be was a telling.
Even if Obama got them $500 billion, all that represents is a smaller amount than we spend on our military every year. And that's just the part we know about.
So no, we're not equals, and we don't have to negotiate. We just have to tell them, and they have to listen or die. Personally, I hope they choose the latter and we eliminate the bad actors. I had a Persian friend who was awesome, and we've seen how their people hate the regime.
Good points. Did you notice how Bibi didn't mention that he shared the intel with France or Germany? I think that was a tactical decision–he probably wanted to, be decided it would create a diplomatic row. Or maybe he conferred with POTUS and POTUS told him not to. Either way, it would have been bad for them.
Did you also notice how Macron made it a point to speak of how France shared intel with us, "convincing" POTUS to stay in Syria? Neither France nor Germany is a part of Five Eyes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes
I bet he and Merkel would really, really like to know what we know. I think he has a better idea now. Also, I think that tree disappearing sent a bit of a message–it was "fuck your tree, we can't trust it."
Agreed. The protestors were angry at all the money Iran was spending on war, as opposed to things like keeping the price of food down:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017%E2%80%9318_Iranian_protests
I suspect some of Q's associates had something to do with that.
But even if the leaders don't step down peacefully, they don't have a chance. We have a choice here: either we deal with Iran now, or we deal with them after they've gotten a nuclear weapon. I don't think that the people of Iran, the Persians, would like anything more than to see these regimes end. I bet a lot of the Middle East, contrary to what we've been told, would like peace. I don't think that Kim Jong Un wanted war–I mean, look at that kid: he's not ruthless. Read this article from his classmates in Switzerland:
http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/new-stories-emerge-from-north-korean-dictator-kim-jonguns-swiss-school-days/news-story/4d49237a5dbe99d421bb8ec7ae60974c
The truth is that, as Q said, it's all for show. These people were required to play a part for the cameras so the USA could continue to be extorted. They're hostages to the cabal. When we free them, they're grateful.
I don't know how Iran is going to go, but we'll see. No matter what, though, I have faith it will be the best decision because already we've seen President Trump do things we never thought possible.
I believe that this will be the peak of our lives, so far as as historic value is concerned anons. Don't let a moment go to waste.
Here's an image of that article. Has anybody ever considered the possibility that Kim Jong Un's brother might have been killed as a threat…to Kim Jong Un?