PB
1871 learnit fag
demoralizeanon shills allover the bread
won't work
we know too much
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
In § 5.11.3, adds recent examples in the footnotes of DoD practice
in adjusting the timing of an attack
In § 5.11.4, adds discussion of the precaution of deciding to cancel
or suspend an attack based on new information raising concerns of
expected civilian casualties or authorizing subordinates to do so, in
order to reduce the risk of harm to civilians and civilian objects. In
the footnotes, adds recent examples of DoD practice of cancelling
or suspending an attack to reduce the risk of harm to civilians.
Refer to § 11.6.2.2 (Prohibition Against General Penalties in Occupied Territory).
134 Refer to § 5.11.6 (Weaponeering (E.g., Selecting Appropriate Weapons, Aim Points)).
18.11 PROTESTS AND DEMANDS TO THE OFFENDING PARTY
An initial step in responding to law of war violations by the enemy is to issue a formal or
informal complaint to the offending party.
18.11.1 Method of Transmitting Protests and Demands. In view of the lack of diplomatic
relations between States involved in an armed conflict, complaints cannot normally be made
through the usual diplomatic channels. However, other methods are available, depending on the
degree of publicity required. The traditional method of complaining by parlementaire directly to
the commander of the offending forces remains, although modern communications have meant
that the message is more likely now to be transmitted through electronic means.
119
ummmmmmmm didn't potus trump do this to deaf ears
are we being told that
D.C. is OCCUPIED TERRITORY
and now the military will intervene?
1.3.2.4 Explicit Incorporation of Concepts From Other Bodies of Law Into the
Law of War. In some cases, law of war treaties explicitly incorporate concepts from other bodies
of law. For example, the peacetime property law concept of usufruct is made applicable to the
duties of the Occupying States.34 Similarly, the GC explicitly applies a peacetime rule with
respect to the nationals of the Occupying Power who, before the outbreak of hostilities, have
sought refuge in the occupied territory.35 And as another example, Common Article 3 of the
1949 Geneva Conventions incorporates by reference those judicial guarantees that arerecognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.36
Congress traitors?
>nationals of the Occupying Power who, before the outbreak of hostilities, have
>sought refuge in the occupied territory
????
leased territory.
D.C
Density 11,506/sq mi (4,442/km2)
1.6.3.3 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The
United States is a Party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
The ICCPR creates obligations for a State with respect to persons within its territory and
subject to its jurisdiction.
96 The United States has long interpreted the ICCPR not to apply
abroad.
97 The inclusion of the reference to “within its territory” in Article 2(1) of the ICCPR was adopted as a result of a proposal made by U.S. delegate Eleanor Roosevelt – specifically to
ensure that a State Party’s obligations would not apply to persons outside its territories, such as
in occupied territory and leased territory.98
4.5.4 Persons Belonging, or Having Belonged, to the Armed Forces of an Occupied State.
Under Article 4B(1) of the GPW, persons belonging, or having belonged, to the armed forces of
an occupied State should be treated as POWs if, while hostilities are continuing outside occupied
territory, the Occupying Power considers it necessary, by reason of their allegiance to the armed
forces, to intern them.
130
Article 4B(1) of the GPW seeks to address the proper status of an army demobilized by
the Occupying Power while a portion of those same armed forces continue the struggle. When
the forces are demobilized, they are treated as civilians, but when recalled for internment based
on their prior service, they are treated as POWs.
131 In particular, States developed this provision
to address Germany’s practice during World War II of arresting demobilized military personnel
from occupied States.
132 These personnel were often interned and sought to escape to join the
ongoing fighting. This provision was promulgated to ensure that individuals in similar
circumstances would receive POW treatment if they were interned. For example, the rules for
the parole of POWs would apply to them.
133 Similarly, the rules relating to POW escape would also apply to them.
134 So, a demobilized person who disobeyed an internment order and
attempted to escape to rejoin his or her armed force would, like a POW, be subject, at most, to
disciplinary punishment in respect of the act of escape.
135
Persons belonging, or having belonged, to the armed forces of an occupied State would
only be entitled to receive POW treatment while an international armed conflict continues.
136
For example, this provision would not apply to a situation like the occupation of Japan after
World War II because all hostilities had ended.
137
4.6 OTHER MILITIA AND VOLUNTEER CORPS
Under certain conditions, members of militia and volunteer corps that are not part of the
armed forces of a State qualify as combatants and receive the rights, duties, and liabilities of
combatant status.138 More specifically, Article 4(A)(2) of the GPW defines prisoners of war to
include:
Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those
of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and
operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied,
provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance
movements, fulfil the following conditions:
(a) that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;
(b) that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;
(c) that of carrying arms openly;
(d) that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of
war Under these conditions, which are discussed below, members of these armed groups may
operate as combatants in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied. By
contrast, a levée en masse may only be formed on the approach of the enemy to non-occupied
territory.
140
4.6.1 GPW 4A(2) Conditions in General. The conditions set forth in Article 4A(2) of the
GPW were derived from conditions found in the Regulations annexed to the 1899 Hague II and
the 1907 Hague IV.
141 These conditions reflect the attributes common to regular armed forces of
a State.
142 By seeking to ensure that participants in hostilities are sufficiently disciplined, lawabiding, and distinguishable from the civilian population, these conditions help protect the
civilian population from the hardships of war. In addition, these conditions contribute to the
military effectiveness of the force that satisfies the conditions.
143
>I think someone wants Americans to read this entire document NOW
https:F//dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
needs to notabled again
video reminder to all Americans what is habbening
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwQCBnhah0w&feature=emb_logo
you are a retard