>>12589049 Exactly. And why were 2,000 just deputized as marshals? Not for a fake inauguration of a senile, perverted traitor, that's a cinch. We may be about to see Q's parade to remember, that being hundreds of scumbags being led away in cuffs. Day of days.

>>12589071 This is highly interesting, and rings true. YES!!!!

>>12589219 As soldiers, they are already there to maintain order and police up any trouble. Why deputize some, unless they are going to make arrests? And no one in their right mind is going to go to DC and cause enough trouble to be arrested, so it has to be the rats going down.

>>12589291 A legitimate question/issue. The legal basis is likely The Insurrection Act–military still acting under civilian control, even if there is not actually an acting President, until an Election Commission can sort it all out. Military patriots agree from the start that temporary power in their hands is to be fully returned at the right moment. Either the "presence" of DJT could silently be there, or he is just flat out named as acting (real) prez until the final, overwhelming statement of fact.

The Supremes are STILL IN PLAY. If clean, they can declare the 20th to be unconstitutional, and that DJT is prez until 3/4 in any event. Even if dirty, they may be FORCED to do this, because of Italian/Vatican/P3 perps being caught red handed. Also keep in mind that the pesky PA case is on the docket for 1/22.

Fog of war. Our leaders are PLAYERS. They are not just pushing wood to be making any filler moves here. They are making the BEST moves, however they have been calculated. Not rushed or obvious.