Anonymous ID: 43a37f Jan. 22, 2018, 8:50 a.m. No.126200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6207 >>6469

Thanks to the Anon who pointed me toward Corsi's analysis of Q's post this morning:

 

https:// www.scribd.com/document/369668690/Qanon-Decode-Four-Posts-Sunday-Jan-21-2018-Will-Sessions-Drop-the-Hammer-Vers-17-0-Jan-21-2018

 

If all this is an accurate breakdown - holee fuckballs. I knew about the elite and their occult crap, etc. etc. ad nauseum - but if THIS is the extent the coup was supposed to do damage to the world - I'm aghast, stunned and horrified at it. Hanging is too gentle. These people ARE sick - and should be drawn, quartered and their dismembered corpses shipped express delivery to LdR and family.

 

Absolutely insane. Would like a consensus as to whether it is a bad idea to point at this Corsi article in a twat to LdR and tell her what I really think. Surely she knows about it - and surely she'll dismiss me as a conspiracy nut - but wouldn't she anyway? Do you think this might be read by others who post to her Twitter telling her what a scumbag bitch she is? Would it do any good? Or bad idea?

 

I know the nature of the golbalist NWO plan, but to see it laid out like this and how close we came to it - I'm shocked all over again. Wow. Almost need a break after that, but it's WAY too important to step back.

Anonymous ID: 43a37f Jan. 22, 2018, 9:33 a.m. No.126494   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>126469

I'm not spoon fed, thanks. Corsi broke the story about the ObamaBC - I remember the interview about Odinga in Kenya, etc. But Corsi was late to the game with Q, so I asked in the last bread if he had found some measure of forgiveness here for famefagging or not. That's all. IMO, his prev analysis busting through some of the coded stringers Q posted previously was well-done. He has his uses.

Anonymous ID: 43a37f Jan. 22, 2018, 10:26 a.m. No.126863   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>126855

Maybe might be set up for context later - but avg normie has no cue about eye of ra - and quite frankly, it makes little difference whether they do right this second. If they know what that is, they aren't a normie.

Anonymous ID: 43a37f Jan. 22, 2018, 10:28 a.m. No.126881   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>126868

I'm down with that - but we need to be able to show proof positive that someone is recieving these emails w/ talking points to post in the meme. Otherwise, ppl will just call it another tin-foil hat conspiracy and dismiss it.

Anonymous ID: 43a37f Jan. 22, 2018, 10:32 a.m. No.126909   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>126884

So we should make another "research" board to brainstorm? Isn't that what brainstorming is? Hashing out brainfarts to get the best ideas collated into a contiguous format?