Anonymous ID: 603b75 Jan. 22, 2018, 9:11 a.m. No.126313   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Is there anywhere with a running log of the most convincing ways Q team has revealed themselves to be legit insiders (i.e. the AF1 photo, the flat out exact line of a tweet, predictions that came to be (Russian Bots 4 AM meeting), etc.)

 

I'm finding that it's hard to explain the clock/markers/map to my normie friends.

Anonymous ID: 603b75 Jan. 22, 2018, 9:22 a.m. No.126408   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6421 >>6521

Been absent for family crisis. My sister's mother-in-law was just diagnosed with brain cancer.

 

Don't have a lot of time to lurk today at work, but wanted to know what the running theory was on the voting-machines e-mail being spread across Twatter. I know WL denied it, but haven't caught up from there

Anonymous ID: 603b75 Jan. 22, 2018, 9:36 a.m. No.126509   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>126487

>>126485

 

Yeah I was talking about the voting machines e-mail - not the fake Seth Rich memo stuff.

 

I knew it was in WL format, but I knew they denied it was part of their drops. I just didn't know if that meant it was completely a fake e-mail or if it was just never released because it was intercepted by NSA and being held onto for safe-keeping/future blackmail.

 

I had a hard time understanding Q's response about it.

Anonymous ID: 603b75 Jan. 22, 2018, 9:36 a.m. No.126510   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>126487

>>126485

 

Yeah I was talking about the voting machines e-mail - not the fake Seth Rich memo stuff.

 

I knew it was in WL format, but I knew they denied it was part of their drops. I just didn't know if that meant it was completely a fake e-mail or if it was just never released because it was intercepted by NSA and being held onto for safe-keeping/future blackmail.

 

I had a hard time understanding Q's response about it.