note: anyone saying 'qanon' or 'q_anon' as part of their copy after the post that Q made in November saying how it would be used to slur and defame us, any one saying 'qanon' is basically mocking the board. It's a shill.
Shill in this case is 'Enemy of America'
(i could be a bit clearer. It's no problem using it as long as one puts it into context. But calling the people here 'the q-anon or the qanon' or using a name 'qanon' and pretending to 'speak' for the 'movement' (which is just a free speech thing, not an organized group) . . . using that means they are mocking the board to defame it. The ancient graphic that says Q_ANON RESEARCH is historical and is OK as long as it's not trolled as part of a discord script.
in this case my statement of 'anyone using' doesn't apply because this person is mocking the mocker.
complicated.
that's why there really isn't any rule. and all people using it aren't 'enemies of America'.
that's hyperbolic.
but those who do it as part of a narrative that is supposed to be taken seriously, those are the mockers.
this one does an anti mock, so I don't say 'enemy'
and that's hyperbolic.
though those who are wilfull and 'knowingly' doing horid shilling to confuse and destroy, aren't really very nice and people shouldn't pay them any heed but jsut to mock them, as this one does.
same as it ever was.
they are always here.
those who praise you without call.
those who speak as if they know when anon know this an interval of hush, call it radio silence, by anyone who is part of what is about to happen.
and timing can not be predicted.
even the players or actors or agents do not know that.