That's exactly the point I think about.
What is one is the actual source; seen something with your own eyes - put it together yourself.
The Mods on VOAT would use that "no source" to delete posts and put them where no on could see it.
I think it's a shill technique to bury info.
Yet if you use a lying source, such as a liar on TV or any of the lying Media outlets, Wiki [which also lies and deletes important info], hell that's a "source"
Throw up your own website and the a source, huh? Total BS
Sorry I didn't proof read
Point still stands
"That's exactly the point I think about.
What if one is the actual source; seen something with your own eyes - put it together yourself?
The Mods on VOAT would use that "no source" excuse to delete posts and put them where no one could see them.
I think it's a shill technique to bury info.
Yet if you use a lying source, such as a liar on TV or any of the lying Media outlets, Wiki [which also lies and deletes important info], hell that's a "source."
Throw up your own website and that's a source, huh? Total BS"
"It's turtles all the way down"
The actual shills have "circle jerks" where they all cite each other. A total joke. Lifetimes and lifetimes, careers upon careers have been spent propping up lies with "reputable" sources.
What about the Universities?
Supposedly "tenure" alleviates the problem- let's scholars research in freedom; but then why were all the scholars who understood the 9/11 fraud and studied it, relieved of their jobs?
No longer reputable? Knowledge by authority is only one avenue of gaining knowledge.