if they view the coolest memes that has value . . .
but they don't get that because they post, they can do that anyway.
there are other rules, that people don't write down, about what happens, in the real world, to people who impersonate Generals.
Historically? The mentioning of them could be rather dicey because in a one-on-one, speaking like that really is what are called 'fighting words'.
and enemies would twist a warning about the reality of others into a threat of violence from an immediate rival.
three letters have enough to do without false accussers adding tasks for them through the methods of constant slander that bad-people use to harm others through institutional badgering.
key takeaway: the false accuser is not a favored character. And alos that person is listed as being . . . a bother. And if you are a bother to authorities during a crisis, you are essentially working for the other side.
and those rules that we dare to hush concerning, that I don't know what they really are . . . those rules will never be said to get applied. it will all just be a 'shhh!!' kind of thing.
people are 'handled'
I tell you this in observation, not as a policy wonk. I write fictions that try to conjecture so others can craft their own truthful narratives.
think for yourself.
don't make the three letter people who work for the right and for the just have a bad day by false accusations and annoyance shilling as an impersonator, or to echo the work of an impersonator.
it's really bad form in Wartime to be an aggitator in a comm channel.