Anonymous ID: ced438 Jan. 19, 2021, 7 a.m. No.12604373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4394 >>4809

>>12604299

Ignore the bullshit baker. Thanks again for stepping up. Apologies for that wierd moment.

 

Sure you guessed that it was that same shill complaining about that notable from Gen. Hyten and other recent digs.

Anonymous ID: ced438 Jan. 19, 2021, 7:02 a.m. No.12604411   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is the real bread for anons question I deferred top this baker last bread.

 

Saw an Ebake an anon prepared just in case. and overreacted.

 

Have a Blessed Day.

Anonymous ID: ced438 Jan. 19, 2021, 7:42 a.m. No.12605089   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12604809 Thats fine and all but need more than one opinion and need an explanation behind the facts presented.

 

>>12604832 what exactly did baker miss?

 

 

It's not like if it is false it wont be disproven later right?/<