there is no us here.
but for those who would dare to plot stuff and whatever name they use, or where ever they do their comms.
the three letters aren't going to punish people for using the same restrooms if the graphetti gets fowl and shit is plotted out on the walls.
same deal here.
if you aren't plotting stuff, what would you worry about?
>>12606072
the crescendo of confused shilling intensifies.
PANIC is in high gear.
pray we don't have a tranny drop.
allegorically I can't imagine that THAT meme would look like.
>>12606072
I didn't tag you on purpose.
you're point of view displeases me greatly.
I wish I hadn't tagged your post by accident.
you seem to be baiting people for a bad effect.
your efforts are obvious.
no one who was really planning what you pretend would boast brag about it here.
you seem to be trap.
remember that teh 'banner dischord' is a staged thing.
please don't participate.
after someone says 'why baker why?' that should be the end of it.
>>12606281
sitting in your high chair pontificating nonsense to people about your assumptions is not what I'm here to do.
I'm not here to tell you what to do.
but I willc all you out when uyou are obviously collectivizing you bad advice with me and as if I'm part of your stupidty.
when the board is being heavily monitored and obviously people are trying to set up others here and cause a problem, why would you do this boast brag 'we will fix it' bit here?
seems rather like coward behavior.
and that is me trolling you.