Anonymous ID: 9072a9 Jan. 19, 2021, 3:26 p.m. No.12614213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4262 >>4347 >>4409 >>4464

>>12613815 lb

>Trump didn't have any to stop the hacking.

 

Ask yourself how and why a rigged election could be thwarted in 2016, not in 2018 (still without any exposure of what occurred), and not in 2020 (when it was obvious that the big fix was in)? I still don’t have a good answer, except that POTUS seems to have been betrayed by every branch of the Federal Government apparatus that should have been watching the process. We have had no evidence of election fraud from any official channels (it’s all been ad hoc volunteers and whistleblowers). I still don’t have a satisfactory sense of whether directions were given and ignored, or no defensive/intel measures were even scheduled.

Anonymous ID: 9072a9 Jan. 19, 2021, 3:34 p.m. No.12614403   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12614262

It’s not only the campaign’s job. DHS had oversight of election infrastructure through CISA. The FEC has oversight. And, given the national security issues in play and the high likelihood of foreign interference, the IC has substantial obligations.

Anonymous ID: 9072a9 Jan. 19, 2021, 3:43 p.m. No.12614609   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12614409

 

>(((They want you divided))) and they are really good at getting what they want.

 

I wouldn’t dispute that for a moment. Election controversies are a key constituent element of regime change operations.

 

But 2016 remains a conundrum: was the rigging unrigged by white hats or was it rigged for Trump by black hats for various purposes (longer term aggravation of social divisions and to teach HRC a lesson for some of the shit she pulled?)