Anonymous ID: e1f64c Jan. 19, 2021, 4:49 p.m. No.12616011   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6057

>>12615857

>so…is that a problem?

Apparently not any more.

But anon is such an oldfag that he remembers way back when you told a baker that some shit was already notabled, baker would apologise and remove it.

Anonymous ID: e1f64c Jan. 19, 2021, 5 p.m. No.12616233   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12616057

>Oldfag should also remember we were a mom-n-pop shop back then, too.

My solitary Q (you) was during that timeline whereby baker assumed we were under attack and anon, tagged by Q, responded that we were DDossing ourselves with 330,000 ips, Q responded 412,000 now.