>>1261855 (prev.)
oh ok, that seems very reasonable.
i got in this morning and caught a few posts/discussions of those, it might have given a misleading impression.
i think every other hour would be a decent compromise to start with, and if it really catches on, or anons do more on their own, it could grow, but as you say, breads are already and will be filled with bad shill posts… a few more prayers in there can't hurt.
Godspeed!
>>1261915 look, that baby does not know his awful parents sold the rights for his picture to be used and abused. it's just wrong. (and yes, filtered for that. bye)
<no not pyramid
re-read crumbs
Hard to swallow.
Important to progress.
Who are the puppet masters?
House of Saud (6+++) - $4 Trillion+
Rothschild (6++) - $2 Trillion+
Soros (6+) - $1 Trillion+
Focus on above (3).
Public wealth disclosures – False.
Many governments of the world feed the ‘Eye’.
Think slush funds (feeder).
Think war (feeder).
Think environmental pacts (feeder).
Triangle has (3) sides.
Eye of Providence.
(…)
Rothschilds (cult leaders)(church)(P)
Banks / Financial Institutions
WW Gov Control
Gov Controls People
SA
Oil Tech Sex/Children
SA Controls (assigned) US / UK Politicians / Tech Co's (primary)
Soros
Controls organizations of people (create division / brainwash) + management / operator of slush funds (personal net worth never reduces think DOJ settlements Consumer Iran Enviro pacts etc etc)
/_\ - Rock (past)(auth over followers)
_\ (present)
(Future)
Order is critical.
Strings cut to US/UK.
Expand your thinking.
Swamp drain.
1 - sexual harassment exit + future
….
[R] - No.
Bomb away.
Q
>In today's world, privacy is only an illusion.
and when you take measures to hide yourself more, you only stick out visibly more to the surveillance tools.
hey anons, look how desperate they are.
they didn't dare mention MOSSAD for 6 months.
now lookit what's popping up here
>sometimes West talks out of turn
"Bring them to heel"
Define heel.
(of a dog) follow closely behind its owner.
<NOONE offers advice how to improve?
tut-tut, don't lie, there, now.
that is demonstrably not true.
saw some comments this morning of anons trying to help you not get so much flak.
That's a pretty hard strike against you, careful.
If you have to lie to make your points…
>>1262210 Then that's very commendable of you, good.
You know by now it's a sensible issue.
Just do your thing and ignore abuse, don't contribute to shills using it as a slide.
>I'M BEGGING YOU.
clearly begging for ( You )s, indeed.
asking an answer you already got.
<NOONE offers advice how to improve?
>tut-tut, don't lie, there, now.
>that is demonstrably not true.
>saw some comments this morning of anons trying to help you not get so much flak.
2nd STRIKE
>Q definitely didn't say that
> I don't recally that this was ever done.
yes, we have many of those, despite what the boredfags, we-already-solved-that-shills, and various nuffin's-happenin-shills would like us to believe.
Q's crumbs on Soros, fortunes, + ++ +++ are confusing, overall. Probably/very likely on purpose, though i couldn't quite say i know why.
No clue who or where we could dig to find their real fortunes, either… but any digging there is more than welcome
>Roman power removed WW
>(lack of lucifer?) hence "dark ages"
interesting…
always found that image of a worldwide civilization parenthesis weird, ever since i found out how little it was actually true
<Don't forget that there are other interested parties.
oh, Condi…
<remember the nature of this regime.
>>1262591 Good, hang in there.
cat herders be damned.