Oh. Look, they are actually called operative words. I wonder how they work. This isn't an explanation of how they work. I just am wondering out loud. I gotta figure this stuff out too, it isn't straight forward. It actually is on paper I think, but in practice is more complicated.

Okay. So I am big on sounds being important. It creates a different vibrations and does different stuff I dunno. I can't tell you how writing or what. I don't know. This is just a random word I picked. You can do it with all kinds of words. If you don't know what a mortgage is, it might be time to find out of you want one. Or hell, why didn't you look up what you were getting before you got it. Someone lied to you. I mean, they did, but they didn't, that word has implication. You like sign your life over in exchange for it or some shit. I don't actually know the proper interpretation of mortgage, but it is significant enough that you should know. 101 New America.

Like that fucking commercial on fox. I hate it. It is a reverse mortgage ad. It starts the whole thing and says "this is not a trick to take your home", but it actually should say "this is actually a trick to take your home after your dead and resell it the next generation, thanks for playing the inter-generational wealth game"

You just have to look at some of this stuff to start seeing how twisted it all is.

For example. Take the word confirm back to old englsih. You get firmus, or firm.

It says "com" instead of "con". I don't know why. I am sure there is a reason. I don't say it comfirm though, I say it confirm. If I said it comfirm.

I might think comm [message] + [firm]

So is that a post office, a message firm?

or is that a firm message, a solid communication?

Etymology. From Middle English confirmen, confermen, from Old French confermer, from Latin confirmāre (“to make firm, strenghten, establish”), from com- (“together”) + firmare (“to make firm”), from firmus (“firm”).

So you could do this, you could say con [a trick or a bad man] + firm [solid]

You see the problem.

Etymology. From Middle English confirmen, confermen, from Old French confermer, from Latin confirmāre (“to make firm, strenghten, establish”), from com- (“together”) + firmare (“to make firm”), from firmus (“firm”).

Y'all just keep commfirm-table. I am comfy.

>>12625733

Forgot the image.

Anyway

I was just reading robot is a czech word that means "forced labor" basically. I dont know, just what this article said.

>>12625796

I actually always liked robot.

I always thought row-bot

I thought of it as instructive and operative towards the rowers on a ship or something.

Like the masters are up top saying row-bot

row-bot row-bot

Telling the bot to row.

Eventually the row-bot is just a robot.

It gets better.

Look at this. A bot in old english is a boat.

So it is literally.

Row-boat

Row-boat

I like life when it is confusing.

>>12625833

Row Maggot

Robot!

Okay. If you believe that each letter is a glyph, or a symbol. It has a different meaning on the mind when you read each one.

It doesn't matter how you say the word you read. The vibration is the same… in this case maybe.

Rock

Rauck

Rauk

Rawk

Which rock did you think of?

Rock and Roll or the rock from the ground?

The discrepancy, didn't have to do with any of the rocks I wrote though.

I think language have moved from being very operativse to being more flowery.

Why can Mr. cook become a cook that cooks cook[food] for cooks? It is like someone just used to look at the person and say Cook. It meant all that shit at once. It was just like, go now, you do. Very caveman feeling,. Like pointing and just saying instructing 'Cook"

I don't know. I think about early man like that. Like when did we start getting our first names?

I am sure we identified as separate, but had to start developing language somewhere and it went on from there.