>But i knew this "no sauce no notable" rule would get mis-used, i tried to warn against it.
would you suggest anything goes?
what guidelines would you propose for notables?
if a post has sauce isn't it better?
don't we want certifiable facts ?
misinformation and disinformation rain here like a monsoon. how should we discern fact from fantasy & fiction if not for sauce?
>are you even from here? ugh
your "apeal to authority" is feeble for a /pol/ack's pilpul so I wonder if the question isn't projection
I'll make is real simple for you
is it desirable for notables to have sauce or not?
the editorial discretion of most bakers is fair at best, they each have some what an idea of the overall big picture but smaller details escape them if not in an area of special interest of that particular anon.
the general rule of notables having sauce is to prevent BS from spreading