>>12640243 (pb)
I didn't repeat it.
It's probably right-on.
it would be a good thing.
I am not going to repeat it now.
if I do and the boards get whacked again that would be 'sort of' a proof.
but if it's true we'll know soon enough.
patience.
>>12640243 (pb)
I didn't repeat it.
It's probably right-on.
it would be a good thing.
I am not going to repeat it now.
if I do and the boards get whacked again that would be 'sort of' a proof.
but if it's true we'll know soon enough.
patience.
they'll all have a good laugh and pop more Champaign?
why doesn't the closed caption feature work?
no we didn't get punched in the gut.
screw off with the constant 'here is what we feel, here is what happened'
bullshit.