this is still Q Research.
if you don't like Q go somewhere else.
snarky bitches should shut shut up ok.
this is a place for people of good will.
you're 'oh Q sucks' bit can be dne anywhere.
you present no facts, you present cabal grooming.
my answer isn't shitty.
you're a badger.
it's Q research.
Do you go into McDonalds and start to spout off about how stupid using cartoon characters is for selling food?
do you work at Disney land with a mickey hanging from a 13 loop knot visible as a small plastic toy hanging from your review mirror?
the answer is : you might but expect people to say ' you must go back, you don't belong here'.
in a free speech place that doesn't mean that people can spurge around insulting the ones who the place was designed to assist?
you label me in a place named for Q for defending Q.
you are a labeler who needs a label to make a slur for which you shall then construct a gulag?
what an accusation that would be.
but point in fact: so you go into your local library and start talking shit about the people who funded to have the library built and then expect others to say 'seriously. They paid for all this. This is their place. They let us use it for free'
you want arrests (all in capital letters).
I want LEGAL behavior. If arrests happen as part of that, so be it.
I think that Roman Historians label on year the year of 4 emperors. Maybe it is even 5.
perhaps someone want to one-up that kind of thing for future historians?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_of_the_Five_Emperors
maybe they are going for wiki/Year_of_the_six_presidentents
well two so far, so four more needed.
well the ordering I suppose
-
DJT
-
Bida-go
-
Kammy the kneeler
-
Nacito
-
Jezibel Queen (? )
who would be the most loathsome swamp creature to have as president?
some tranny who is ugly and snarly would be a good population to look through.
MICHELLE might be the one.
catholic actually means 'truth' or 'true', doesn't it.
so by definition what you say is just straight-up paradox.
no one here is 'under Biden'
he's a titular president.
everyone knows he's a puppet doing a mock.
in your mind he's turned into an evil killing machine out to destroy anyone who disagrees with you in a chat room.
He's a memory-loss patient.
he's a puppetted front man for an old-family poltical machine.
He's an old man who shouldn't be president.
Titular president, not the leader.
If he tells the people to come and arrest me they're gonna be like 'OK, Princips, welll do that'
and then let me escape through a trap door
in the floor of the Colloseum, and leave a mock corpse saying 'as you say Princips'.
I'll be safe.
but they will be plotting, by then, "how do we get rid of this guy"
wait, that's a plot of a movie . . .
or is the plot to a movie a description of what real people do when faced with corrupt power?
when I saw the picture of all those soldiers facing the other way I wondered what would prompt that. The obvious answer is 'it was a way of expressing their feelings about how they feel about the election results being fraudulent (in their minds)'
but perhaps it was a crazy order from some worried political operative. 'have them all stand with their backs to him so we know that none of them are about to . . . '
and then later they can slander the troops for turning around. And say 'see, disloyal'
"but sir, we were ordered to turn around"
someone would need to ask the soldiers involved what their motives were.
I'm just making up narratives and this is called conjectorial commentary.
first line uses a 'you people' false-hood-of-collectivist modifier, when he collectivizes those who use a board with all who post there, so that anyone can go post stupid stuff and this one will say 'oh, see . . . you people' and a stock putdown.
next line: tells us his imaginings. Fine. so he's admitting conjecture.
makes a false count of posts. How many are there? Did you look at each id? did you take time to say 'huh, someone who's chatty and real.' probably not.
ah, the 'this moement' which tags him, that use of phrsae, as one of the spychologist groomers who tried to lure everyone to Washington DC and put out memes with fake-supremicist codes in it.
and then it accuses of me not reading history.
basic point: accademic marxist with a penchant for putdowns. probably a bait body, with a smoking smile.
but a bitch to people because it wants you to be ideologically captiulated to it's version of falsehood.
and it can't have you being a playful smart chatty person, because that doesn't suit it's current narrative.
You'd be nice to me in a cafe, dude. So try to be a little better.
one night
an anon
posted a pepe meme
of pepe praying under the Dome of San Pietro.
20 minutes later there was a blackout at the Vatican.
I used 'outline' feature in 'neon' on that meme to make this 'Pepe Blackout meme'