>>12804

>Section 1. Requirement for Procedures.

The following is required

> (a) The Director of National Intelligence shall, within 30 days of the date of this memorandum, issue and release publicly a policy

make a (new) policy

>requiring that each element of the Intelligence Community (IC)

all Intelligence Agencies have to do this

>develop and maintain procedures for responding to requests from

they have to come up with new procedures of how they will respond to requests

>Federal, State, local, tribal, or territorial government officials for non-public identity information concerning known unconsenting United States persons

requests that concern "known unconsenting United State persons"

>that was originally omitted from disseminated intelligence report

"known unconsenting United State persons" that hadn't been a topic in intelligence report

My question here: is a "person" always a human being or could it be a jurisdictional person (not a single human being)?

>>12913

This is exactly the question I have, Anon.

>>12985

"…partnership, or a corporation…recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties."

TY, Anon.

So, this EO tells all Intelligence Agencies to come up with a solution on how to get a public hold on "unconsenting" groups that were "spared" by the agencies until now? My English isn't good enough to formulate this better. But I'm convinced that it it very important to understand what POTUS did here exactly and why.

>>13097

whitehouse.gov =EO

>>13112

Would be nice to have this explained by a legal expert/ jurist.

>>13375

Because he's still in the Ecuadorian embassy.

>>13427

If everything that doesn't add up or isn't logical is now explained with "necessary disinfo", this has changed into a brainwashed cult and is not critical thinking or autism.

>>13527

Yes, bc he's still at the embassy.