Yes exactly. But why are all the reports in the news stating China's launch was a success and SpaceX was a failure. While at the same time officials from SpaceX are stating everything went well and they are showcasing it as successful.
I believe the former but this was in context with SKY FORTRESS ENABLED.
Disinfo? SpaceX claim that everything went right (when it didn't)
OR
ZUMA mission was NOT a failure and may have had something to do with China's failure?
I have not seen anything about ZUMA being connected tp SPECTRE. I have seen talk of it being an EMP delivery device. But all of this is just talk.
I do know:
1) N2YO is tracking it.
2) News says it is in the Indian Ocean (or soon to be)
3) SpaceX is bragging about the launch (you don't brag if you lost a $b satellite
4) China launched their satellite duo on 1/9
5) Claimed success - news says successful
6) N2YO shows the Chinese satellite as debris
7) Q Posted SKY FORTRESS ENABLED just prior to SpaceX Launch.
getting told "dis info is necessary" is tiring.
It can't be very good dis info if a simpleton can find that USA 280 is still orbiting.
Q said follow the news - well here are obvious inconsistencies with the news concerning a freaking top secret payload that is supposed to be in the ocean - just after we are TOLD
SKY FORTRESS ENABLED..
So which Q statements do we ignore because "dis info is necessary"?
Am I the only one curious about this? I'll leave off then.
James Bond, Spectre, Q…
Pretty typical of crypto types.
Snow-white
3 Stooges
Movie Themes
It seems that most W & W types have similar way of thinking, and it hasn't changed much in 40 years. They named card readers and sorters at one of 'my sites'.