Since yesterday there have been so many concerns about the quality of info from Q.

Many have said that because a date and time they belived something would happen didn't happen, then the whole thing was a larp and we were betrayed.

Let's think logically, shall we….

Q gave the info to the public fr a reason, because the public plays an important part.

1. Did Q think only good guys were monitoring the drops? or

Did Q know that bad guys were monitoring the drops too?

1. Did Q think that the public who received info about a covert plan would keep it quiet or

Did Q think that the public would take the info and do all sorts of things with it, from blabbing it, to distorting it, to removing it?

This bring us to dates that people thought things would happen.

Even though things didn't happen the way people thought they would happen, in the timeline they thought it would happen,

the very fact that there was so much info about this possibility of this occuring, kept the people who thought they were getting arrested, continuously looking over their shoulders, waiting for the hammer to drop. Imagine the effect that must be having on their minds. Slowly breaking them down psychologically.

We must continue to look at things logically. Everything has a purpose.

>>12654977

it's not idiotic if you consider the public a part of the plan. If you know that the public will take the info and run in different directions, than you also know that the bad guys will have to split up to go down these directions too. Divide and conquer works against the bad guys too.

Now, with all of the necessary distractions and disinformation, the A Team can continue with it;'s covert mission with much less distraction because the bad guys are preoccupied following all the directions anons are going.