Timing is everything, anon.
You do not rally the troops to war by running, screaming from your house trailing a bandolier as you sprint down the road to fight windmills.
You rally the population to war by warning them of the evil approaching and letting it reveal itself.
However, I would remind you that war always changes. While there will always be a place for guns and bombs, the nature of the battlefield has changed and the weapons along with it.
I do not question the motives of people who give vent to their own willingness to lay down their life nearly as much as I question the motives of those who seek to prod others into death through efforts of shame.
If you have stood on the front of battle and led the charge to several victories - I would recognize your place to challenge others to join you. However, when you can present no clear plan (not that any sensible person would seriously post one here) as to what it is we need to join you in risking our lives to do - I'm going to say stop glowing.
If and when there is a time for violence, it will not be seriously discussed here and even non-violent actions/operations that take place in the real world should be confined to their respective operating elements.
There is more to winning a war than shooting at people. The ideal war requires none of that and wins through either the collapse of enemy resolve to commit or the achievement of key strategic goals. If your're really good, the enemy never knows exactly how close you are to winning (or they are to losing) and the respective armies hardly ever see each other to shoot at each other.