Anonymous ID: cf768a Jan. 21, 2021, 10:20 p.m. No.12662649   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12662302

>>>12662196

 

>>What firmness should anon order for someone used to memory foam pillow?

 

>Somewhere in here

 

fake… there's no sauce on this assertion

Anonymous ID: cf768a Jan. 21, 2021, 10:29 p.m. No.12662749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2953 >>3167 >>3247 >>3273

>>12662654

>Hillary Clinton's

 

Such a child-advocate HRC is… whuddathunk when one is fresh outta law school defending sex crimes

 

https://www.vistacollege.edu/blog/resources/the-education-of-hillary-clinton/

 

During her second year, Rodham worked at the Yale Child Study Center assisting in !!! child brain development research. !!!

 

Rodham worked on Democratic Senator Walter Mondale’s Subcommittee on Migrant Labor.

Rodham became an editor on the Yale Review of Law and Social Action, which was a rival of the mainstream Yale Law Review. The Yale Review of Law and Social Action took a controversial stance in favor of Black Panther activists, several of whom were on trial in New Haven for the murder of a fellow member.

 

After graduating with honors in 1973, Hillary Rodham completed one year of !!! post graduate work on children and medicine.!!!

 

Civil Rights Activism During Law School

In addition to her academic pursuits at Yale Law School, Rodham took an !!! active interest in children and child rights. !!!

After reading an article by Time Magazine contributor and civil rights attorney Marian Wright Edelman, she attended a speech that Edelman gave at the law school on the subject. Hillary approached the author and asked to work with the civil rights activist at the !!! Mrs. Edelman’s Washington Research Project — still in existence as the Children’s Defense Fund — over the summer. Edelman accepted the proposal, and after obtaining grant money, Rodham began working with the organization. !!!

Anonymous ID: cf768a Jan. 21, 2021, 10:48 p.m. No.12662955   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3167 >>3247 >>3273

MSM: call it backsliding

 

The overwhelming plurality of the anonymous reporting in the mainstream

press (43%) was essentially blind. It said simply sources said, or our news

organization has learned, offering no effective characterization of the source.

 

Less than two in ten statements (17% of the anonymously sourced

reporting) offered even the slightest hint of the source's allegiances.

 

The mainstream press' use of anonymous sources was not that

different than those of the tabloid press, such as Inside Edition or the

National Enquirer, though the tone of the two different kinds of media,

which is not quantified by the study, varied considerably

 

 

Project for Excellence in Journalism

~1998 Pew Research: The-Clinton-Crisis-and-the-Press-A-Second-Look

https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/legacy/The-Clinton-Crisis-and-the-Press-A-Second-Look.pdf

 

Among the findings:

• Six in ten statements from anonymous sources in the mainstream

media (59% of all anonymously sourced reporting) were characterized

in the vaguest terms, "sources said," "sources told our news

organization" or "sources familiar" with the event.

• Less than two in ten statements (17% of the anonymously sourced

reporting) offered even the slightest hint of the source's allegiances.

• Print was more forthcoming about the nature of its anonymous

sourcing than was broadcast

• The mainstream press' use of anonymous sources was not that

different than those of the tabloid press, such as Inside Edition or the

National Enquirer, though the tone of the two different kinds of media,

which is not quantified by the study, varied considerably.