Anonymous ID: 78f0bd Jan. 21, 2021, 11:37 p.m. No.12663411   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12663311

>Our results very strongly suggest the existence of two different authors behind Q,

kek, we thought it was more than that.

The world is really struggling with Q. They skeered.

Anonymous ID: 78f0bd Jan. 22, 2021, 12:15 a.m. No.12663701   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3722

>>12663660

>You should wonder more why they are trying to make this such a big deal, propaganda much.

no reason we can't gaslight just like they do. make the dems look bad…good with me.

Anonymous ID: 78f0bd Jan. 22, 2021, 12:18 a.m. No.12663724   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3742

>>12663692

>We'll that's sure a relief, that a useless turd shitting up the "qresearch board," approves of Q. You are well deserving of the dumbest fucking shill award, glow fag! Learn to Code!

 

are you this much of a dick IRL or just online?