>>12666074 (pb)
I jumped the gun but my stance is correct that a contemplative method is better than in 'in the streets with signs' method
sorry I got you so upset.
>>12666048 (pb)
your argument is spurious bullshit.
the other anon is correct. Technically he never did call for violence.
my idea was that he was giving false hope and conflating religion with politics, and that often leads to violence. I was wrong to persist in claiming he had a direct call but didn't I also say 'maybe i am worng no body cares' that was my way of saying 'oh shit, ya, I jumped the gun. this is someone else'
but I wanted to see how far he would go with it.