Anonymous ID: 18bc78 Jan. 22, 2021, 8:58 a.m. No.12668174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8233 >>8236

So with clarity after the last few days. Let's look at this with two paths.

 

  • Donald Trump is part of the cabal

  • Donald Trump is /our guy

 

2016 is the giveaway. If you can cheat this easily the cheating was going on in 2016. (((They))) weren't sleeping to the fact Trump was filling huge stadiums while Hillary was barely filling college auditoriums. (((They))) could read the online surge and support Trump was gaining after announcing he was running. Remember, EVERYONE has access to what we see. We aren't the only ones here or on half chan, reddit (ugh), all forms of media.

 

"They never thought she would lose". This is true but anons have been assuming this meant they ran a lazy campaign. They sort of did. They assumed the cheating at the polls would do their heavy lifting. Remember, Q said, "good people prevented the rigging". The rigging was supposed happen. Hillary didn't need to fill stadiums (same with Joe). She didn't need overwhelming support (just like Joe). All she needed to count on were that the votes would be rigged and she would win.

 

So then. Where were these good people to prevent the rigging in 2020? How does an outsider with no clout so to speak get himself into office in 16 but can't keep office after 4 years of being on the inside? Because as Q said "this was the only way". This is how you get voter ID and show corruption. "It had to be this way".

 

So Trump being cabal, nah. If he was he wouldn't of lost. He had momentum and had us "blind to his ways". If his ways were supposedly bad there's no logic in switching up leaders when the country is so against Joe. Trump could have kept going on and leading us into whatever trap the cabal wanted. That didn't happen. Logic says winning in 2016 and losing in 2020 …it was allowed to happen. We all know Trump won. The left knows Trump won. It's a trap. It's the show.

 

/our guy

Anonymous ID: 18bc78 Jan. 22, 2021, 9:10 a.m. No.12668321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8409

>>12668233

Fair point. But George…man…he was deep in it for decades. He seemed to have one objective. He achieved it and got out and handed everything off to a new young, charming hot hand that led the masses further astray. Joe is not the young, hot hand. The move from Don to Joe doesn't make sense from a domination factor if both were helping the bad guys. Bush didn't have the support Trump does. Bush couldn't lead the masses away. He did what he came in to do and got the hell out. People openly accepted Bill Clinton. I did. I was asleep back then. I thought he was going to be great. Someone not old and stuck in traditional ways. if you think about it, the left's domination with people started with Bill.