>>12668075 (pb)

>>12668729 (pb)

Wasnt speaking about anons who doubted, or wavered. You wouldnt be human if the 20th did not shake you, anon. Shook me too. Actually, I shed a tear or two to watch it happen. That's just being honest, and honest of any other anon to admit that. Should have clarified my statement better, I guess

Anon was called a radical today by someone I've known my whole life.

I was speaking about the "Oh yeah, I read Q, but didnt believe it, just read it because it was interesting, that's all. I never believed it. I didnt fall for it" type of person in my statement. I guarantee, when all the dust settles, they will be claiming Q again.