>>12673922

>Indications we are not in control

We can only act on the information we have in front of us. We do what we can to hold Biden's admin accountable by memeing it for stupid and silly things - as we did with Obama and when Trump made bad calls.

However, hear me out on the notion of the plan and control.

What do you do with control in the first place?

Where many in Q's proverbial position might go about things the very direct and abrupt way had they the control, this also is from our perspective and immediate objective. We want the criminals prosecuted and the truth laid bare for people and for a new era of freedom and greatness.

But would that work? Control isn't an inexhaustible resource which can be spent on every direct objective.

Further, would we really enter a new era of freedom if, say, facebook and google were to get blasted from on high and some new solution handed to us - without even having to realize how important it was to seek out better alternatives (on a civic scale) and true horror of what we fought against?

We assume that what we want is possible to attain through the most immediate and expedient means in front of us, and that the control Q claims to have would be invested the same way - toward the same objectives.

To quote a favorite character of mine: "Witness human nature, Mattoi! Pleasure leads to greed; greed leads to their downfall! One taste of a life of affluence and they're enslaved! Slaves to a system which I created! They are nothing more than pigs! Pigs in human clothing! Pigs who must be tamed by FORCE!"

The relevant quote can be found at 30 seconds in: https://youtu.be/5fqtYRFFMNg