Anonymous ID: 6c5355 Jan. 23, 2021, 3:18 a.m. No.12680792   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0814 >>0816 >>0830 >>0854

>>12680668

I'm having doubts anon, my company is building a 150 mile pipe and according to mainstream science in a pressurised system gravity has no impact on the fluid pressure. One end of my pipe is therefore going to be 4.5km below the other end when you account for curvature yet all our modelling for transmission is based on a flat and level pipe. By my calculations we should have over 450bar of pressure at the delivery end with no pumping required yet modelling is requiring significant investment in pumps.

 

It doesn't add upโ€ฆwe are building this thing on a flat plane!

Anonymous ID: 6c5355 Jan. 23, 2021, 3:31 a.m. No.12680865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0912

>>12680816

Yes but thats velocity not pressure, for pressure you need PRVs or PSVs which are not in the build. Yes pumps will have an impact but we need the pumps to push and what I'm saying is that using everything I know about fluid dynamics we should be holding it back not adding more pressure

Anonymous ID: 6c5355 Jan. 23, 2021, 3:39 a.m. No.12680912   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12680865

I think the key point here is that we don't plan to have any hydraulic headloss along the full 150 miles (barring leakage) and we have only modelled for frictional headloss but that pipe is not straight and level, it is (by nature) going to fall 4,500 meters due to curvature but we haven't accounted for that in our calculations

Anonymous ID: 6c5355 Jan. 23, 2021, 3:50 a.m. No.12680984   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12680944

...look Home Alone 2 wasn't his greatest moment but its a cameo so I think you are being a little unfair anon, he was excellent in the Fresh Prince. He made a much better President than he did an actor though, I'll agree with you somewhat