>>12687131
>might be a brilliantly packaged trojan horse
My only history w/ anons is when q has been around. In other words, I am post q anon.
I might be wrong, but anons do not come across to me at all as someone who would otherwise rise up. I have always seen them as relentless truth seekers with mad digging skills.
If nefarious, I never saw it as an attempt to pacify but have recently come to a potential conclusion that it was an attempt to keep anons busy with other diggings so that they were too busy to see what was really going down.
please note heavy emphasis on "if nefarious"