>Looks like ice displacement from some sort of tunneling capability.
Big tunneling machine.
More likely, the ice-sheet equivalent of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_%28geology%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust_fault#Thrust_duplex
>Biden is the Unconstitutional "coup".
Biden was made president in the manner that the Constitution describes.
>coup" if it's done by the laws as outlined in the Constitution
The Constitution does not define a process for this. But Thomas Jefferson did proscribe the solution for this situation outside of the Constitution.
>So, the Constitution does not protect against fraudulent elections?
Nope. I hope that gets fixed in the next one.
>Elections are supposed to represent "the will of the people"
It doesn't say that. Sauce:
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/full-text
The closest thing to a case that can be made that this election was unconstitutional is that the electors may not have been selected quite "in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct" ie: according to the States election laws. But it's going to be very hard to argue that the electors were not chosen in that manner that the legislatures directed when it was the fucking legislatures who chose the electors. Maybe if such cosmically damning evidence of fraud is released that the legislatures wake up and decide to back Rudy and Sidney's case then that argument will fly. But right now both halves of the uniparty support Biden over Trump.
Does such cosmically damning evidence exist? Maybe. But we no longer have the ability to widely disseminate it (social media censorship/crackdown).
I agree with Our Guys thoroughly exhausting every legal avenue before what will ultimately need to be done if for no other reason than so that can defend their actions with that fact. And that is how I read Rudy and Sidney's actions when they were launching countless legal efforts that never has a snowball's chance in hell. I'm just fast-forwarding to the end.