>>12690813

I don't think it would matter at this point. Too much false data mixed in with real data with a splash of bad data to begin with.

I think it's better to look at the 2020 election compared to the actual votes from elections since, say, Reagan '80. Anyone with business-level Excel skills can convince themselves within 30 minutes that the '20 election just doesn't make any sense.

You really have to go back to women's suffrage to see a voter turnout like we had in '20. Everything about it is wrong and Americans know it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_elections

>>12691009

Republicans are the party of Lincoln

Republicans freed the slaves

Republicans gave slaves citizenship and suffrage

Republicans were behind civil rights acts

More Republicans supported women's suffrage than Democrats

Republicans are the party of Eisenhower

Republicans are the party of Kennedy (j/k, but not really)

Republicans are the party of Reagan

Republicans are the party of Trump

A Republican party led by Trump will return the party to its best traditions and accomplishments. There's no reason to form a new party and hand these accolades off to rats like McConnell

>>12691250

And Franklin