https
://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-armenia-politics-protests/armenian-protesters-block-routes-to-capital-road-to-airport-idUKKBN1I30H5
https
://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-armenia-politics-protests/armenian-protesters-block-routes-to-capital-road-to-airport-idUKKBN1I30H5
https://
uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-trade-china/close-xi-aide-to-meet-u-s-trade-delegation-in-beijing-idUKKBN1I30C0
2 Heroes
Another perv
http://
www.foxnews.com/us/2018/05/02/former-cnbc-director-pleads-guilty-to-hiding-camera-in-bathroom-to-spy-on-teenage-au-pair.amp.html#click=https://t.co/YErlzBspha
Que des ennuis Monsieur le Président!
Yup
Is Trump right about judges' leanings? Maybe, review shows
BY SUDHIN THANAWALA
Today
A majority of the judges — 24 — were nominated by Democratic presidents. Only one of those judges supported Trump's power to block all travelers. In February, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge William Traxler, nominated by President Bill Clinton, said in a dissenting opinion that the administration provided "logical conclusions and rationale" for the third ban and addressed his earlier concerns that it was motivated by anti-Muslim bias.
— In contrast, 10 of the 14 Republican judges in the group sided with the administration and moved to uphold restrictions on foreign travelers. One of the notable exceptions is James Robart in Seattle — a nominee of President George W. Bush —, who issued a nationwide order blocking the first ban.
AREN'T JUDGES SUPPOSED TO BE APOLITICAL?
The code of conduct for federal judges says they should not allow "family, social, political, financial or other relationships to influence" their judgment. Judges generally refrain from overt partisanship and often hold themselves up as neutral arbiters of law.
But the law can be unclear and open to varying interpretations.
https
://apnews.com/cc39185fe15346d7a7c7c021bc3d4d90
“Cowardly” Zuckerberg Faces Ultimatum From UK Parliament If He Refuses To Testify
(It’s ValuBit sorry link won’t copy)