>>12697122 (PB)

Let's get something straight here. Not to be the grammar Nazi here but I am seeing WAY TOO MUCH of this going around and it needs to be cleared up. For context:

POTUS 4-10-20 did not / would not / could not SIGN the insurrection act. He would INVOKE the Insurrection Act of 1807. He would have done this by signing a Presidential Order Invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 or some shit like that.

For a POTUS to sign an act, it is establishing in law a particular type of bill from congress sent to him for acceptance and signature. Considering the Insurrection Act was already signed into law in 1807, POTUS 4-10-20 did not sign the act.

I get what fags are saying but we deal in facts here and facts do matter. To say POTUS 4-10-20 signed the insurrection act when he invoked it is like saying you took your dogs for a walk when you just ran them attached to a sled down the Iditarod Trail for 8 days.