>>12698607 lb

I am happy to talk with you on the issue. I really want to have a conversation, I am not trying to smear you or something.

I just never know where people are coming from, they always want to define God, but fail to define their understanding of it, they just tell me what it isn't, not what it is.

Some people seem to come in hear and just smear on the topic without offering any discussion.

I would be happy to hear of your faith or understanding, upbringing, anything to get a basis for what you call God?

It becomes confusing, because scientists call the electromagnetic fields of earth the God-field, and have started using the word God, as a catch all for things like new-age spiritual understandings.

I am asking. What is the root of your problem? Theology, the writing of it, the organization of it? I see faith tradition and teaching, the inscription of it, and the ritualized practice of it in group.

Is it all these you have a problem with or some?

>>12698522 lb

Yes.

I think this is the best evidence.

It is seen as normal to wear this stuff.

What if Trump was wearing that stuff, or Biden?

What if the inauguration was a ritual from a secret society? Would people think that is odd today?

People don't find it odd that our nation was founded, literally, the cornerstone of the capitol, was laid, by a grandmaster mason, in full garb, during a special ritual, not related to America or Britain.

It is plain and clear as day, without dispute, from any normie.

The nation's founding fathers, the dominant group of founding fathers, were related to an Ancient wisdom cult stemming from Ancient Egypt.

If you don't know. Look up Scotia and the egyptian relation to the Isles. The Irish are also descendant. Just look around. You can put it all together.

Who were the federalist and anti-federalist?

Are they the same as the masons and anti-mason groups of today?

There are two sets of founders.

One Masonic

One Not

Period.

Not you OP, but everyone else, you all are not going deep enough. Get to the root. Stop looking at the modern and trace the present to the past.

https://etc.ancient.eu/uncategorized/scota-mother-of-the-scottish-people/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotia%27s_Grave

>>12698651

oops. forgot image

Why don't this strike people as weird?

Someone go tell America this is weird shit.

You aren't gonna convince everyone they are diddling babies in their clubhouse.

You can convince them it might be strange this same group is still in power today.

You may convince them this nation was founded my a secret society.

You scare people with the word cult, they don't believe you.

Cult is a perspective issue, some people think Q is a cult. Some people here act like they are in one, I understand where they are coming from.

>>12698678

Washington is a Federalist.

The Grand Master is a Federalist.

Masons are Federalist.

They prefer man's law over nature law?

This stuff is super important America

What is the bill of rights? Why do I need it?

Why are my rights not guarenteed in the pre-amble with life, liberty and pursuit of happiness?

Why do I need to further enumerate the meaning of the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness?

The declaration of Independence looks like it ought to protect the Constitution from ammendment

Some of are busy convincing everyone else.

That we need to abolish all this.

The 10 rights on the your Bill of Rights.

Are there for a reason.

They are not arbitrary.

The rest, the amendments, are whims of man.

There are super-ceding documents being rejected.

Your Declaration of Independence super-cedes all document, possibly.

Let us look, please. To see if there is not a legal basis for the abolishment of federal government?

I ain't trying to Abolish America, I am trying to start over without the Mason's running the show.

The preamble, let me tell you, the preamble, ABSOLUTELY, WITHOUT QUESTION, encapsulates the Bill of Rights. The preamble and the bill of rights, ought to encapsulate all ammendment. All precedent should be set from the BIll of Rights, based on immutable natural law. The preamble, a summation of these laws.

The same masons, the federalists, that founded this country, are the same ones responsible for the increased federalization of our STATE-BASED Republic.

THE TENTH AMMENDMENT IS IN SEVERE VIOLATION, NATION-WIDE, STATES NEED TO SUE

REMOVE ALL FEDERAL AUTHORITY AND REINSTATE PROPER ENFORCEMENT OF THE 10TH AMENDMENT

get real. Do you even know what the tenth amendment says. Read it. It is about leaving people alone, live and let live, don't tread on me, all that shit.

If the Mockingbird, were to properly educate the American public about their government''s foundation based on ancient wisdom, show them the bill of right's have meaning above the whim of man, and re-instate the 10th amendment. There could be a resolution of internal conflict in America.

DO YOU KNOW YOUR BILL OF RIGHTS

literally

I ask for a reason. I grew up playing politics my whole life and never realized that #10 was even a thing i should worry about. It is always #1 #2 #4 #5. Okay. I still don't know #7. I can't get everyone to think #10 yet. How am I gonna worry about #7?

#10

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

About the declaration… and the relation to future documents. I have a theory.

listen to my theory here

The mason's did not sign the declaration of independence.

How many signers are masons and how many not?

How many federalists vs anti-federalists?

Declarationism is a legal philosophy that incorporates the United States Declaration of Independence into the body of case law on level with the United States Constitution. It holds that the Declaration is a natural law document and so that natural law has a place within American jurisprudence.

If someone can help me match signers of the Declaration, with the Masons, I think I can prove that the majority founding fathers, the masons, the federalist, did NOT sign the Declaration of Independence from Britain. This country IS STILL loyal to the crown.

>>12698865

John Handcock, first signer.

On the fence…

It looks like he is an anti-federalist at the signing of declaration, but has made an agreement to side with the federalists, the masons, by the time the constitution has concluded.

Soooo. Handcock is a sell-out. Fuck him and his signature.

>>12698919

I have told you my hypothesis.

Anyone think I will reach a different conclusion or have a hypothesis of there own?

By then end of the day, I will have reviewed all, or a large enough sample, of the signers to see, if they were federalist or anti-federalist, mason or non-mason on an ideological basis.

I think it is great.

Where are all the Mason signatures on the Declaration?

Why did the Masons not declare independence? Maybe they did and I will find equal signers. Like i say, just my hypothesis.

>>12698957

I want to re-instate the founding sentence of our nation. This is where the dream is. This is where you find social mobility. Possibility of achievement.

What is liberty?

What is life?

What is the pursuit of happiness?

I do not have a problem

Find me one thing, from the bill of rights, that is not included in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

How is my government going to help create this? Why do I want this social contract with my neighbors called government?

The preamble to the Declaration of Independence begins with the famous sentence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

>>12698995

>> preamble to the Declaration of Independence begins

typo

I don't know about you all.

There is this science idea.

Basically, if I have a child, that child will receive the experiences that I have had.

Not directly, but in a way, it will be passed down.

Now. If I am not mistaken.

I have the blood of Virginia Patriots.

Anti-federalist, anti-mason, nice people who didn't want to deal with all the Union / Colonies in the first place.

You didn't leave us alone in 1776

You are gonna leave us alone today.

Go north of the mason-dixon

Do what ever you want.

Or this nation will divide and form 2 republics.

>>12699081

it isn't the end of the world

when your anti-gravity engine

is almost ready

and the elites are ready to leave

you didn't get a golden ticket out?

Okay . America….

Reconcile this ship

Wor - Ship

War - Ship

Was the warship also doing worship?

>>12699115

row bot war ship

robot worship

I don't know.

ancient pharoahs, their ships, the hebrews….. were they robots or some shit? ancient tech, etc… how do you assume ancient tech without robot?

>>12699165

See etymology of rowbot

I did row and bot in old english

you get ro - “to carve, scratch, etch”

and bot - (“to break, split”)

so a robot, is to "write" a "split"

or create?

In old times. People could say row and bot to together, and make sense…..

Is this crazy….

From Middle English rewe, rowe, rawe, from Old English rǣw, rāw, probably from Proto-Germanic raiwō, raigwō, raih- (“row, streak, line”), from Proto-Indo-European reyk- (“to carve, scratch, etch”).

bot (n.) in internet sense, c. 2000, short for robot. Its modern use has curious affinities with earlier uses, such as "parasitical worm or maggot" (1520s), of unknown origin; and Australian-New Zealand slang "worthless, troublesome person" (World War I-era)

From Middle English bot (English boat), from Old English bāt (“boat”), from Proto-Germanic baitaz, baitą (“boat, small ship”), from Proto-Indo-European *bʰeyd- (“to break, split”)..

>>12699227

I been doing this old english language thing

You need to see how the language was destroyed from Old English to Modern English.

The entire context of original meaning is lost and distorted.

We literally, don't know what we are really saying to eachother anymore.

We hear words, big ones, on the surface, but underneat them all is a meaning that seems to relate or ring true today.

>>12699258

Okay. See here.

Obvious.

If you are with me Scotland was founded by Egyptians….

English is egyptian

I been looking at this stuff a while.

Compare your english glyphs, the alphabet, the set of symbols that describe a sound.

These are not like factual infographics, they need work..

But I was looking at ancient glyph/egypt compared to modern glyph/alphabet or the alpha-bit the first bit. The first set? is it? or is this just a word? can anyone show me if english came before arabic?

Old English (Englisc, pronounced [ˈeŋɡliʃ]), or Anglo-Saxon,[1] is the earliest recorded form of the English language, spoken in England and southern and eastern Scotland in the early Middle Ages. It was brought to Great Britain by Anglo-Saxon settlers in the mid-5th century, and the first Old English literary works date from the mid-7th century. After the Norman conquest of 1066, English was replaced, for a time, as the language of the upper classes by Anglo-Norman, a relative of French. This is regarded as marking the end of the Old English era, since during this period the English language was heavily influenced by Anglo-Norman, developing into a phase known now as Middle English.

>>12699310

these are interesting to me

I took what I learned studying the relationship between modern english and ancient glyphs and made my own set.

It isn't a language or something.. it is an effort.

An idea.

Who put A first and Z last? Was A invented first? or did people decide to put it first? I would think I or O would be the first symbols cause they are most simple.

Anyway. these are graphical representation to try and tie modern context to the meaning of each letter vs a meaning of a word.

Each letter means many things, but maybe they all relate in a way..

How is the birth of a mammal different from other mammals? it just it, but they are all mammalian births.

The letters are not representation of sound. They are representation of concept.