>Several Super Bowl Advertisers Bow Out over Fear of Offending Viewers
On the surface, this article is top kek. But, the reality is, who would pay $5.5m per spot for the lowest viewed Super Bowl in history?
>There is evidence of Weighted Election Fraud.
It has always been my philosophy that math is truth. There is a simple way to prove 1 + 1 = 2 and that never changes.
With that said, I have never spoken to anyone about the election who didn't come away with "something doesn't sound right" when you explain how:
-
Trump received increased votes with women and minorities, so for him to lose the popular vote the way he did, he had to have lost the support of while males?
-
Trump won more counties than in 2016
-
Biden lost more counties than Obama in 2012 and 2016
-
Biden received more votes than Obama in 2012 and 2016
-
The election was swung on a very small number of districts in 6 states
-
Each of those districts had a common theme to vote counting and mail-in ballots not seen anywhere else
-
When Trump won in 2016, what pushed him over was tied specifically to campaigning in key states during the final week
-
Math is not proving what we are seeing
What becomes really hard to comprehend is:
Trump won in 2016 with a clear to see strategy, but Biden won in 2020 with unexplainable dumb luck?
There is so much circumstantial evidence that if you can't get a court to agree it needs to hear a case, then you are only left with 2 options:
-
The majority of the public sees the points laid out, and disagrees with the courts
-
You failed to lay out the case clear enough to the public, so they agree the courts don't need to hear the case
We have #2. In my opinion, the only way Trump's lawyers couldn't lay it out for the public to grasp as well as I did via bullet points is, they wanted the fraud to happen