Which phase of the storm are we in?
Anyone care to explain the high level view? You don't need to understand every component of a car to drive one.
Our Universe may have been created by superior beings in another universe, according to a physicist in the US. If he is correct, it may finally explain what Albert Einstein called the most incomprehensible thing about the universe: the fact that it is comprehensible to human beings.
Edward Harrison of the University of Massachusetts came to this astonishing conclusion after attempting to explain one of the great puzzles of science: why the "fundamental constants" of nature appear to be "fine-tuned" for the emergence of life. A good example, he says, is the gravitational constant, which governs the strength of gravity. "If it were slightly smaller, stars like the sun would not shine," says Harrison. "However, if it were slightly stronger, stars would burn their fuel and go out before there was time for biological evolution on any planets." "Conventional physics completely fails to explain this example of fine-tuning or many others," says Harrison.
"However, it is possible to explain them if the universe has actually been designed at a fundamental level for the benefit of life." This is not to say that Harrison believes in the necessity of a Creator. Instead, he proposes that intelligent life itself creates new "offspring" universes where conditions are just right for life. In each offspring universe, life then evolves to a high level of intelligence and in turn creates more offspring universes.
She is lying again - he said peacefully protest. Only question is, did Trump know Antifa were ready to smash windows and incite trouble.
If you think this sounds like pure science fiction, you would be wrong. "We already have a mathematical blueprint for how to make new universes," says Harrison. The blueprint is the creation of our own universe. According to grand unified theories, which attempt to show that the fundamental forces of nature are merely facets of a single "superforce", the universe was created when a super-dense "seed" of matter triggered a runaway expansion of space. During this splitsecond phase of "inflation", the matter to make countless stars and galaxies was conjured out of the empty vacuum itself. The universe, as proponents of inflation are fond of saying, was "the ultimate free lunch".
Harrison says it would only be necessary to recreate the precise conditions that triggered inflation in our own universe in order to spawn a new universe. Alan Guth of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has suggested a way to do it using a 10kg mini black hole. Its super-dense interior would be the seed that would immediately inflate, not in our universe, but in a space-time connected to our own by the "umbilical cord" of the black hole. The cord would snap when the black hole "evaporated" and a new baby universe would be born.
Harrison says the precise details of universe creation do not matter. "The important thing is that if beings of our limited intelligence can dream up wild yet seemingly plausible schemes for making universes then beings of much higher intelligence might know exactly how to do it." The key feature of any offspring universe is that it inherits fundamental constants similar to those of its parent. This immediately explains why our universe is fine-tuned for life.
Trump missed a great move - he could have sent the patriots in a different direction, leaving the Antifa idiots all exposed like the maggots they are.
Anywhere, but the Capital building would have worked! He could have told them to protest at a local park for all it matters.
Until now, argues Harrison, only two explanations have been advanced for why the universe is set up for life. There is the "anthropic principle", which maintains that we exist because the universe is that way; if it were different we would not be around to comment on it. "What is so unappealing about the anthropic principle is that it requires there to be countless lifeless universes," says Harrison. "I consider that waste on a truly cosmic scale." The alternative explanation is that our universe was designed by a Creator, a point of view accepted by many people - including scientists.
"Unfortunately," this explanation terminates scientific enquiry," says Harrison. Harrison's theory of the "natural selection of universes" may offer a third view. "The creation of the universe drops out of the religious sphere and becomes a subject amenable to scientific investigation," he says.
Harrison is not the first to propose the idea of self-reproducing universes. A few years ago, Lee Smolin of Syracuse University proposed that universes in which the conditions were ideal for the formation of black holes generated the most offspring universes. "However, there was no compelling reason why universes which were selected for black holes should also contain life," says Harrison. "My theory makes the connection." Harrison thinks the reason why the universe is understandable to humans is now clear. "The superior beings who created our universe inhabited one not greatly unlike our own. Our universe was not created by God - a superior being - but "angels" - superior beings!"
theory after reading https://cultstate.com/ which is all about blackmail.
obviously for blackmail in the era of publically produceable deepfakes there is one overriding factor for it to work.
media or public/private to key people (wife, etc.) exposure ability, which always existed.
the game now would be to create/control credible authentication bodies, who could not only (in public perception) validate blackmail leaks/exposure as real, but also debunk/discredit real data as fake.
thus authentication bodies of deepfakes v real will in a way, be the new (fake news) media. what msm now does with facts and fake facts the authentication bodies will do EXACTLY that with data. thus just as nations/governments exist in large part to grant legal tender status to a banks created currency, giving the money makers control of everything (almost), those who control data authentication bodies will control alot, and will have the ability to deny TRUTH.
this needs to be countered by patriots, we already have a bit of a problem with TRUTH being censored and labeled 'fake' (conspiracy)
Or they are already comped and this is a big fuck you coming.
But why would intelligent beings want to make new universes? Harrison suggests several reasons. One may simply be to prove that it can be done. "It is not inconceivable that the goal of the evolution of intelligence is the creation of universes to foster intelligence."
Then again, there is the possibility that superior intelligences may not be totally inaccessible for occupation and exploration by their creators,'" he says. "If intelligent beings know how to create universes of various designs, they might know how to inhabit them by some form of transference." The obvious question is, how did the first universe begin? Harrison admits that one possibility is that God created the first universe. "Thereafter, superior beings in universes took over the creation of further universes.
"Another possibility, he says, is that there was an initial "ensemble" of universes, in which the fundamental constants had random values. Life was possible in at least one member. "Thereafter, by reproduction, intelligent universes dominate, and the original unintelligent members then form a vanishingly small fraction of the whole."
ty for input
i see your point, but as they get better (beyond the publics ability to determine), the stakes get higher, up to the point deep state will use organizations to discredit the real material and perhaps authenticate the fake, when of course it serves their purpose.
ultimately if one group is able to monopolize that ability (as has been done with central banking, and msm, and much of tech) that would be bad, and if bad for the people, we can be assured the cabal will have incentive to mmake it habben.
no one really though bottled water would cost moar than coca cola when i was a kid, kek.
watch the water
thinking this is not good for humanity.
worth a dig?
Investors can now trade water futures
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/07/investing/water-futures-trading/index.html
When light adjusted
Looks very much like the Flag of 1776
https://www.ushistory.org/Betsy/flagfact.html
explains bush family buying aquifers in south america?
watch the water
watch CA
Nasdaq Veles California Water
Index futures
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/07/investing/water-futures-trading/index.html
Investors can now trade water futures
https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/nasdaq-veles-california-water-futures.html
No. Superbowl played Feb 3, 2020.
Yes, although logical deduction comes from discounting as many eventualities as possible.
Once intelligent design enters the picture, singular or plural, they then have to explain what the designer/s is/are and what is 'outside' this universe. That is a huge problem for them.
Looks like it was painted in a Church
The particular universe we inhabit is not random; it is designed. The fundamental constants that permit our existence did not appear out of thin air: they were specifically chosen. Our universe was constructed by a super-intelligence precisely with us in mind. The fact that the universe is perfectly suited to the evolution of humanity is in no way accidental.
If the fundamental constants of nature were marginally different, we wouldn't be here. Unlike evolutionary theory, where it is true that apparent design can arise from a long process of natural selection, fundamental constants are, by definition, not amenable to evolution and change.
There are two main possibilities: either there's an infinite number of universes where all conceivable values of fundamental constants can be found (in which case we inhabit a random universe where chance supplied the fundamental constants that underpin our existence), or there's one universe where the fundamental constants have been specially chosen (in which case we inhabit a unique, designed universe created by a super-intelligence that knew how to assemble the correct set of fundamental constants).
Which alternative do you prefer? The universe where everything is just right for our existence has been labelled the "Goldilocks" universe. Is it just right by chance or design? Your answer will shape your approach to life.
(Isaiah 9:2) The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.
White House basement? It's where he is most comfy.
>Thomas - no show disputing
>Breyer - no show in trouble / scalia?
>Alito - no show disputing
Maybe he is sitting in a side support wing of a smaller basilica style church? Need an architectfag
Website: https://redpill78news.com/category/live-stream/
I think he is sitting in an actual place.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2021/01/valves-gabe-newell-imagines-editing-personalities-with-future-headsets/
Valve’s Gabe Newell imagines “editing” personalities with future headsets
This fat fuck rings all kinda alarm bells. Used to paying for females. Fat and ugly. All into brain-computer-interface.
Right around the rona, and when Q started. The pedo hunts.
This fat fuck started to get very interested in moving to New Zealand.
I bet he's a kiddo rapist.
He is beyond rich. Valve isn't public traded. Private. It would be easy to blackmail with komromat this fat fuck, fucking a kid and killing the kid. For Gabe to get money out of the company into MOS and CIA hands.
also the mockingbird is not hating us anons enough. we gotta get them to really talk shit about us and Q moar.
they make up new rules, no precedent or constitutional clarity?
may have vp (as pres of sen preside?) or another senator?
will be interdasting.
i think roberts may not do it because of constitutional interpretation???