>>366790

>>366829

>>366850

>>366873

>>366908

All these posts have complete disregard for basic Hermeneutics, as far as who is talking to who.

They also disregard the setting (context) related to the appearance and application of such verses when they were recorded.

There was an ordained time for this shot-gun approach to preaching. It was ordained for a season in order to take the gospel to all of the world. But that time is now past, according to the Bible.

The third day (or "age") was from 1607 (when King James ordered a "people's version" of the Bible) to 1997 (the 390 years shown Ezekiel, at Chebar {which means "extent of time"}). During this time, as also taught there, it was appropriate for the commercial preaching business to mix and match and apply scripture at will (mixing all grains).

But since 1997, this is no longer ordained, as it displaces the true ordination of the (4th) bread to be produced from the leaven hidden in the three measures of meal (the kingdom parable).

This would be a completely different application of Word, defined by recognizing the symbolism and processes of change it speaks of as on-going in the real world presently. This then becomes recognized as "spiritual law" because it is pnuema (breath). It is the vital unfolding of real life events similar to ancients ones but as having very real and very important, present meaning - APPLICABLE TO ALL NEW AND PRESENT CHARACTERS.

This new and time-appropriate use of Scripture

is possible ONLY if and when we recognize the processes, names and terms recorded as representative of other figures moving today in repeats of the very same concepts and stories recorded of old.

It is the time of Jesus teaching us with parables about the kingdom - which He said would one day come.

At the same time (which is the 40 years after 1997), any preacher still mixing the grains at will are only providing "food" that supports the now-present OPPRESSION of the people, and actually prevents them from being defended with Scriptural insight.

For this reason, in God's opinion, those who are doing this then are only offering people shit sandwiches - because the oppressors have already taken the life supporting forces out of such doctrine, leaving only their own "human feces "refuse" for the people.

>>367210 This is what haoppens.

Any who are interested in how Scripture really can and very much does speak for and to all the present concerns of truth promoters, needs to first put away much thinking common to commercial doctrine and read about the seven seals in the following, which teaches of the fourth bread - or simply review the last ten pages where it brings it all into the most present relevance.

https:// cog49.com/ft.pdf

>>408661

>So yeah. CERN, Dwave, Ai…

I think fear of the unknown has concern for these blown out of proportion for some people.

>I want to know what thoughts any of you have on the mark of the beast.

Every item or concept of Revelation is to be taken in the "spiritual" sense, as it is intended only to be understood by the spiritual man,

not the carnal (who takes things literally).

(Likewise, EVERY dream in the Bible [of which Revelation is one] has ONLY symbolic fulfillment)

The mark relates to the head and the hand, which also have symbolic values. And while preachers commonly put this prophecy in the future, this actually prevents people, except those like us, from realizing we are already victims of exactly this threat.

Buying and selling are also symbolic (appar. of their political value), being teaching, which is relating/influencing thinking or belief. It is still common today to say "I'm not buying it," or

"He really sold me," to make the point here.

The symbolism of the head is also obviously, thinking or belief, and the hand is heavily taught in Scripture as relating to commitment

(marriage) or what we commonly do, such as in an occupation.

When we put all these together it describes exactly those that we are attempting to help, particularly the complications they encounter when trying to accept the truths we all need these days.

A mark is a defect, it means there is a lack or an imperfection, or a wound. This "lack" prevents them from accepting even obvious truths if they (get this:) take issue with what they believe or think (head) or run counter to things they are committed to, such as their occupation, history or covering for concealed crimes (hands).

This comes from p98 of the First Tablets of Moses study here, which also has a lot of other very timely studies of the like:

anonfile.com/t2Gf99d8b2/firsttablets_r7917.pdf

>>463102

Paul introduces the Mary that does this. It is a new church. It is in America.

You are actually a lot warmer than you seem to think you are.

Paul made many mentions of his need to go to Rome.

This also has meaning related to the end of his dominance in

ordained leadership, which is essentially, in the present generation.

The very last chapter of Romans is his "appeal" to Rome for this time.

It relates to the "ordained" system of our present truth advocacy.

See p133 in the seven seals doc, one of the earliest docs on this board.

Here : cog49.com/ft.pdf

>>128870

>…the identity of the Anti Christ…

Why does John warn of anti-Christs (plural)?

Could Paul be referring only to a "type of character" in the singular?

If so, he would be in agreement with John, and the Bible with itself.

Do Christians really believe there has to be only one, and

that he has to show up with it tattooed on his forehead so everybody knows?

If you were responsible for misleading the seminaries over the last

several generations, would you not want to teach there is only one,

and wouldn't preachers rather believe this too?

The way John describes it, the anti-Christ is any that deny Jesus is come "in the flesh."

"In the flesh" has a spiritual meaning. Flesh is offering in the OT.

As teachers, we should all be careful we recognize when the offering of Christ

is present in the world. Very few people knew when it was the first time.

>>483631

>>505739

It seems they are sending a different message.

Both of them. You haven't been keeping up.

The Vatican is a dinosaur of the 3rd world dark ages.

Protestantism took the West to world power.