I'm a newfag.
What's with all of the dogs and shit?
We're assuming it's a code or something, right? What is the popular angle?
This is clearly a joke.
Okay, so we're saying that because McNoName did the whole boot thing and suddenly died like a day after posting a picture with his dog?
Is the suggestion that HRC posing with a dog and posting it to Twitter means she will soon die, or is the presumption she is calling a hit?
Try a little harder and stop spamming and it might land.
You're on the right track, but this shit just doesn't look genuine, even if the info is somewhat accurate.
Oh, I've tried and been told to tighten my lips.
It hasn't stopped me though..
To summarize, you speak a universal version of Latin. English is merely written, not spoken.
I'm not sure of the specifics once it branches out past English, but most of them are easily parsed and people like Wynn-Miller had a decent handle of it. I've called him a modern Thoth.
Words are spells.
We speak with magick and it affects the world around us.
Normies hardly comprehend what is meant when we say "Word of God".
God is literally everything, all one being experiencing itself from an array of directions, like a kaleidoscope, but it's a living creature and this permeates through all microcosm and macrocosms alike.
As above, so below.
I'm pretty sure that's the joke.
Just don't try and pretty it up so much. Condense things and don't fit so much in to one post.
I don't know about everyone else, but I always scroll right past posts that are long, have goofy formatting while also not using anything close to proper grammar and when people use colored text.
It's not because you don't have anything valuable to say or can't, but because shills have saturated the attention grabbing styles for the most part.
but pretty much >>12713303
Yeah, in case you haven't noticed, that's entirely on purpose.
>avoid root etymology
Choose carefully. Of course, I haven't put enough thought in to things to actually do this, so call me a hypocrite.
On the contrary, I don't think you should shut up. I completely disagree with them and it seems more like they're stifling us and making excuses about "national security" which just seems flimsy at best. But, what do I know?
For now, I've decided to suspend my impatience, though reluctantly… for the most part.
I can appreciate that.
I just think sometimes it helps to be pedantic, especially when reception hinges upon readability at certain points.
You're not doing this for the autists, after all.
I was just weighing in. You don't need to mind me. Just don't think I don't appreciate you. If I thought you were worthless, I would just gloss over it.
There's no reason to resist us being on the same page about each other's ideas, anon.
Sure, it's my responsibility to comprehend what you're saying, but it's hard to be effective when you make leave so many gaps for everyone else to fill in, even if that's more or less our specialty in the scope of things.
I like this a lot more, anon.
Things actually do circle back to hieroglyphs. Maybe now we know why.
Stick insight of sigils in there and you'll make more progress, it appears.
No, you're actually on to something.
I'd love to show you another place to discuss this. They'd love to have you.
Unfortunately, this isn't the right time nor the right place.
Be confident some take note of these things, anon.
Well done.
You should look to David Wynn-Miller and the movement he began.
Find out how this relates to maritime laws and you'll make a bit more progress, I think.
The ideas about Quantum seem to hold water. After all, David is no longer alive.
kek
Okay, fine. I'm not new, anon. I just figured you'd actually let me in.
I've never got the dog thing.
I guess it isn't that important anyway. Just figured I'd ask.
Do you think the costs outweigh the benefit of anchoring social media to pedophilia?