>>12713777 (pb)
Lin Wood nor anons can direct firing squads. Just hyperbole, but of course muh radicalism, muh violence, muh censorship
You forgot muh monolith!
Indeed not, in such circumstances it would be justice under the law. More importantly entirely constitutional.
Agree, they are essentially charging him with hate speech and incitement to violence for claiming the election was stolen. Ergo any evidence of election fraud would be crucial to Trumps defence.
Did you actually listen to it? It was a civil and sensible discussion about current events.
Why would anybody attack that? It’s no different to the tactics used by the MSM on Trump. Attack the messenger not the message.