Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 9:27 p.m. No.12716257   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6273

>>12716233

You're not getting attacked, anon. You have no evidence outside of Rudy, Bannon, and Chanel's word that something was fucky. Review the evidence for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. When you have actual evidence of your claims, remind yourself that she'd have been about 13 years old when taking that cock, and then delete that shit.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 9:29 p.m. No.12716272   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Phil 4:4-9

Rejoice in the Lord always. Again I will say, rejoice! Let your gentleness be known to all men. The Lord is at hand. Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus. Finally, brethren, whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthyโ€”meditate on these things. The things which you learned and received and heard and saw in me, these do, and the God of peace will be with you.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 9:35 p.m. No.12716337   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6345 >>6358 >>6359

>>12716232

 

>Ok Boomer

 

"โ€œBoomerโ€ is also, evidently, an insult to an older person, who may or may not technically be a baby boomer. The development of the word as a pejorative is a pretty recent phenomenon, best exemplified by โ€œOK boomerโ€ โ€” a phrase that has gained heavy traction on the social video app TikTok, among other internet platforms. Much like the poorly aged โ€˜90s slang โ€œtalk to the hand,โ€ โ€œOK boomerโ€ is a derisive repudiation, a bit mocking in tone, like a verbal eye roll โ€” and itโ€™s directed specifically by a young person toward someone older."

 

Try again fagot.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 9:39 p.m. No.12716370   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6581 >>6685 >>6775 >>6900

>>12716273

Chats are interesting; not going to lie. Not evidence of anything other than "folding laundry". Also, Hallie was a woman scorned and we know how that goes. Tell ya what; let's take Natalie and force her to testify on the stand in front of the entire world and drill her with tons of questions about Hunter's cock to get to the truth.

 

Is that what you want?

 

Perhaps the issue isn't with anons constantly reminding everyone that Hunter took advantage of an impressionable young girl who lost her father to ZOG wars and was likely abused by "pops" also. Perhaps the real issue is with anons obsessing over something that (really, honestly) is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things considering his multitude of other crimes, sedition, and basically treasonous activities.

 

WHAT ABOUT THAT?

 

How about anons think about a solution for Natalie and her sisters to save their own asses in the wake of their entire family, likely, getting rounded up by the US Mil and taken off to GITMO where they all should be anyway. How about that? You think Natalie might call you "fuck face", affectionately, after you do that to her entire family?

 

Anons edge hardcore on some patriot happenings and rarely ever think about how the fallout might affect those that have been abused, repeatedly, by people they trusted the most. Perhaps constantly focusing on pedophilia is a problem anons need to reflect on instead of project from this medium.

 

Put that in your Jesus pipe and smoke it.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 9:58 p.m. No.12716522   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12716320

>the way to end this is not the military

I concur with your reasoning though I still expect the SC to actually make a ruling for Trump when the time is right. The conservatives on the Court will be told when. All this jabbering about the military stepping in is embarrassing.

I'd support it if the SC cucks again but hoping for it? No way.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 10:07 p.m. No.12716584   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6620 >>6622

>>12716464

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6028_DAPam670-1_Web_FINAL.pdf

 

Page 118 of the pdf, Nigger "18โ€“8. Coat, black, all-weather (male and female)

a. Type. The black, all-weather coat is a clothing bag issue item.

b. Description. The black, all-weather coat is made of polyester/cotton (65/35) in Army shade 385. The coat is a sixbutton, double-breasted model with a belt, convertible collar that buttons at the neck, gun flap, shoulder loops, adjustable

sleeve straps, welt pockets with two inside hanging pockets, and zip-out liner. The back of the coat has a yoke and center

vent. The coat is one-quarter lined with basic material; the sleeve lining is made of nylon taffeta (see fig 18โ€“7). There is

no wear-out date for the interim version of the double-breasted coat made from polyester/cotton (50/50)."

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 10:07 p.m. No.12716586   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6653

>>12716531

When you buy a blue car, every 3 cars you see if blue.

When you buy a house, every few people you know it buying one, or knows someone that's buying one.

When you "separate", you suddenly realize all the signs of those that notice how domesticated you are.

 

Patterns are everywhere, and discovering them is innate. Sometimes retracing the patterns is a healthy way to find new patterns. Not trying to sway, but it's an observance I've had and live by.

 

<3

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 10:16 p.m. No.12716649   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6717 >>6836 >>6919 >>6954

>>12716581

Hallie had the exact same underwear and Natalie never was shown to have that mark on her inner left wrist. The geo location on the pic is the most convincing, but isn't proof.

 

Listen,

Anons don't believe in coincidences because of the conditioning of the plan; that is 100% understandable. The people that should know, review, and make judgement on the evidence you have and the scores that are likely to exist elsewhere, work in a realm of legal justice. Not IB forums, research foxholes, twitter, the chans, hallway conversations, the DW or even between anons and their acquaintances before bed.

 

All of you that bought into the sensationalism of this shit should be ashamed of yourselves. You've delved into lizard-brained behavior, and an easy distraction. What really matters, here? Is it Hunter impaling his niece, or the stake and fate of this great nation?

 

I hope those girls get justice. I hope our country can heal. Most importantly, I hope anons can wake up to the light. This drudgery is what's really killing the movement right now. Seriously. Focus on what really matters. Our Republic.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 25, 2021, 10:58 p.m. No.12716908   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12716320

I've read quite a few versions of what you're claiming about no public officials having sworn an oath per the Constitution. I cannot speak for other officials, but can say with certainty that I swore the exact, proper oath as a condition of being commissioned as a Notary Public.

 

By the way, "READ THE CONSTITUTION" does not qualify as sauce.