>So, you guys are not able to see both sides of the coin?
>
>You are not able to post argument for or against Q being a psy ops?
>
>You avoid this question and just hope that everything ends in a happy end?
Let me refresh your memory.
Q said that they were a team and mostly military people were involved.
Q said they would sometimes use disinformation.
Q said some of their stuff was comms not meant for anons.
So Q drops mention that functioning as a military psy op was a big part of the Q drops.
Why does this need to be debated? Q said the drops were psy ops. You can accept or reject that claim, but I don't see why a Q fan would reject it.