Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 3:53 a.m. No.12718581   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Posted this late in LB, but will post it one more time for those who didn't want to see it or chose to ignore it.

 

>>12718488 (LB)

 

>>12718205 (LB)

>https://youtu.be/KrJF8Iz-7R8

>

>White 3:12:35

>

>Green 4:00:27

>

>White again 8:28:10

 

Incredibly suspicious that a woman would change her shoes!!! Plan or no Plan, this shit is as ignorant as the Castle Rock/movie set crap.

 

This video proves that Biden signed those Executive Orders in the WH. GoogleEarth the area in question. Despite what anons are claiming, there are two roads behind the windows of the Oval Office, which in fact, is on the ground floor of the West Wing. Moreover, if you go down to the street level - as you "drive" towards the WH's North Portico - you will pass by a guard house.

 

That guard house is visible at .25 speed, around the .4 second mark. Sorry people, Biden was in the Oval Office. Grab a copy of this video before it disappears. It seems that we will be batting down the fake and ghey "movie set" hopium for a while. It is astounding that the youtuber who posted this video thinks it proves the "Castle Rock" movie set.

 

It does anything but = Castle Rock = "movie set" = DEBUNKED HOPIUM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcjTksKaJkM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcjTksKaJkM

 

Video won't embed this time for some reason. Will try one more time.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 4:14 a.m. No.12718683   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8713 >>8765

Leibniz, was indeed party to the answer of life's great mystery. Apart from being a genius in mathematics, logic and philosophy, he also made contributions to geology, physics, chemistry, economics and history. King George I of Great Britain described him as a "walking encyclopedia." He was credited along with Isaac Newton of devising calculus. As the creator of the binary system and the inventor of an ingenious calculating machine, he can be considered the first computer scientist. He had an abiding fascination with alchemy, and his philosophical system was considered by some to resemble Kabbalistic accounts of reality. He published only one major philosophical book in his lifetime.

 

Gรถdel believed that Leibniz's key work, much of it highly mystical in nature, was destroyed by a shadowy group intent on ensuring that his most important revelations did not see the light of day.

 

Gรถdel was convinced that the same group that had hounded Leibniz was now after him, centuries later. He died from malnutrition after refusing to eat because he was sure his doctors were trying to poison him. As for Leibniz, after being under surveillance for many years, and being accused of atheism for his unorthodox religious beliefs, he died in obscurity and was buried in an unmarked grave.

 

Leibniz's great rival was Isaac Newton.

Despite his mathematical and scientific achievements, Newton spent most of his time practising alchemy and wrote over a million words on the subject.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 4:19 a.m. No.12718703   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8723

>>12718682

Hard to watch a movie when you are always chatting. Although, it was sure nice of whatever anon was here last night to drop new unedited pics to remind everyone of Hunter and his predatory predilections because that's what's really important, right?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 4:21 a.m. No.12718713   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12718683

The following quotations illustrate Newton's unconventional interests.

 

"The more Newton's theological and alchemical, chronological and mythological work is examined as a whole corpus, set by the side of his science, the more apparent it becomes that in his moments of grandeur he saw himself as the last of the interpreters of God's will in actions, living in the fulfillment of times." F.E. Manuel, The Religion of Isaac Newton (Oxford 1974)

 

"Like all European alchemists from the Dark Ages to the beginning of the scientific era and beyond, Newton was motivated by a deep-rooted commitment to the notion that alchemical wisdom extended back to ancient times. The Hermetic tradition the body of alchemical knowledge was believed to have originated in the mists of time and to have been given to humanity through supernatural agents." Michael White, Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer (Addison Wesley 1997)

 

"Isaac Newton wrote fellow alchemist Robert Boyle a letter urging him to keep 'high silence' in publicly discussing the principles of alchemy. 'Because the way by which the Mercurial may be impregnated has been thought fit to be concealed by others that have known it,' Newton wrote, 'and therefore may possibly be an inlet to something more noble that is not to be communicated without immense damage to the world if there be any verity in [the warning of the] Hermetic writers. There are other things besides the transmutation of metals which none but they understand.

 

'The fact that Newton never published a work on alchemy cannot be taken to mean that he knew he had failed [at the Great Work]. On the contrary, it probably means that he had enough success to think that he might be on the track of something of fundamental importance and so had good reason for keeping his 'high silence', even though there is nothing to indicate that he himself was searching for that mysterious 'inlet to something more noble.'" B.J.T. Dobbs, The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 4:26 a.m. No.12718729   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8803

>>12718676

Conspiracy theory as a pejorative invented by CIA to cover their assassination of JFK and facts that people noticed. This is a shill attack to ween you America firsters back to jewwy world view about perverts etc.. Take down people of talent for the sake of the sheep. You will loose as smart beats stupid. Not a conspiracy just true.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 4:35 a.m. No.12718765   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12718683

The conflict between Leibniz and Newton ostensibly revolved around a bitter dispute about who had priority in the discovery of calculus. Newton, with more powerful friends, won the dispute, accusing Leibniz of plagiarism. It is now agreed that Newton was first, but he failed to publish his results for a number of years and in that time Leibniz independently formulated calculus, and published his results before Newton. It is the notation devised by Leibniz that is used in modern calculus.

 

In fact, the dispute between the two men raged most fiercely in the secret world of alchemy. Newton, and the shadowy group with which he had associated himself, managed to pervert the true message of alchemy and ostracize Leibniz and his supporters. They spied on Leibniz and his closest confidants and harassed them.

 

In the same way that they managed to twist alchemy into a mockery of what it was intended to be, so they eventually succeeded in perverting Freemasonry too. Through the Leibniz-Newton conflict may be glimpsed the secret struggle that underlies apparent history. Gรถdel was one of the few people who perceived this hidden undercurrent.

 

Gรถdel, one of the greatest geniuses of modern times, wasn't wrong that a sinister group had taken an interest in both Leibniz and him. That sinister group is real and the struggle against it continues to this day.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 4:44 a.m. No.12718792   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12718679 Debunking actually demands facts. Biden is a career criminal. You are a shill publishing here as a paid propagandist to influence this board against DJT, who many of us witnessed being cheated out of his second term. We won't forget, we outnumber you and are big believers in second ammendment. So let's see who actually gets "deprogrammed" low IQ perverts? or Trump suporters.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 5 a.m. No.12718869   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8943

Leibniz posed the question: "Why is there something rather than nothing?" Heidegger declared this to be the deepest and most far-reaching question of all. William James referred to it as the "darkest question in all philosophy."

 

Nothing is more mysterious than "nothing". From it, everything else follows. For a long time, the concept of infinity was as mysterious as "nothing" but Georg Cantor revolutionised the human understanding of infinity. There has been no Cantor of "nothing". It remains the enigma it has always been. Simplistically, "nothing", unlike "something", seems to need no explanation. It requires no work and no creator. As soon as "something" appears, the questions flow. Where did "something" come from, what is it made of, where is it going, what, if any, laws does it obey, who or what made it? Will other "somethings" interact with the first "something", and so on.

 

The gulf between nothing and something seems infinite and unbridgeable.

 

People who claim that the issue is irrelevant because "God" has always existed and therefore there has never been a state of "nothing" have simply begged the question, and reformulated the original question in different words. We now have to answer why there is God rather than nothing. We are no further forward. How can "God" be more likely than "nothing"? God is the most complex entity conceivable. How can infinite complexity be more probable than nothing? Nothing requires nothing. God requires everything. Existence, rather than being improbable, should be inevitable, so the mystery of nothing has to be solved before that of God can begin.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 5:14 a.m. No.12718931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12718915

>>12718877

Link?

https://twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1352209333854076928

 

Department of Defense

Flag of United States

@DeptofDefense

Sea stormer.

@USNavy

sailors participate in a visit, board, search and seizure drill in the South China Sea.

 

Oh, there we go.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 5:16 a.m. No.12718943   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12718869

Some atheists say that the existence of "something" is a brute fact. After all, no one, no matter what they think, can deny that something exists. So, these people say, let's ignore the problem of "nothing". They say that time, space, matter and energy began with the Big Bang and nothing can be said about what happened before that event. (Oddly, some then claim that the Big Bang was the result of a "vacuum fluctuation", thus demonstrating that something did in fact happen prior to the Big Bang.

 

In the 18th century, Laplace stated the Principle of Determinism: "If at one time, we knew the positions and motion of all the particles in the universe, then we could calculate their behavior at any other time, in the past of future." This is the basis of classical physics. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle of quantum physics destroyed Laplace's aspiration since it tells us that we cannot simultaneously know the precise position and momentum of even one particle never mind all the particles in the universe. This isn't an experimental limitation, but a fundamental aspect of the quantum world. It accords with Max Born's insight that in the quantum world there are no exact answers, only probabilities.

 

If a particle has no definite position and momentum and can be described only probabilistically then it simply doesn't exist as "something" in the classical sense. The world we live in on a day-to-day basis may seem solid, predictable and full of "somethings", but it is underpinned by a weird, shadowy foundation that gives way as soon as we touch it. There is simply nothing tangible there.

 

The Superposition Principle of quantum theory tells us that quantum particles can exist in a probabilistic cloud of different states that in classical terms would be mutually exclusive of each other. Only if and when the "wavefunction collapses" (to use the jargon) is one of the potential states definitely selected.

 

An atom consists of a nucleus surrounded by electrons. The nucleus is tiny and carries a positive charge. The domain of the negatively charged electrons is vast in comparison (about a billion times larger than that of the nucleus). In other words, between the nucleus and the surrounding electrons is an enormous space that is neither something nor nothing โ€“ but is a strange probabilistic cloud, a superposition of all the different states that the electron can possess.

 

The reason that human beings do not get pushed into the ground by gravity is that the negatively charged electron "cloud" surrounding the nuclei of the atoms of the ground repels the negatively charged electron clouds surrounding the nuclei of human feet (or those of shoes), and this effect is much more powerful than gravity. In other words, our way of life is dependent on the strange clouds of electron probability surrounding nuclei. The solidity of atoms, of matter in general, is an illusion.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 5:41 a.m. No.12719079   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12719024

Everyone leave twitter today. If enough people cancel unfollow and never vist twitter, then jack bolsivik dorsey will get fired at next Board of Directors meeting comming up pretty soon. Help out and cancel sean penn's butt buddy for good.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 5:46 a.m. No.12719111   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

https://silverseek.com/article/silver-shorts-last-stand

 

Anons need to keep stacking silver. Price is suppressed purposely by shorts.

Driving price up causes institutions to lose $$. If they give up, it moons.