>>12718929
>Q was someone close to POTUS (or had access to those who were close to POTUS) and who had inside, planning information - this cannot be denied…
>How did Q know what the 2018 Senate race would be before it happened - doubling-down when it looked like it wasn't going to be 53-47??
Q made plenty of other numerical guesses that never came to pass - 11.3 for one example. So he got lucky with 53-47. Proves nothing.
>How did Q know that the National Guard would be deployed to many states…years in advance??
The National Guard are often deployed. Q did not specify a year. every October, anons would conjecture 'is it this year'? NG were never called out to quell riots or protect elections in October as Q predicted
>How did Q know that CEOs would be resigning en masse…years in advance??
CEOs resign all the time. Your confirmation bias saw it as a Q proof when it was just natural attrition.
>How did Q know conservatives would be censored globally…years in advance?
Conservatives are often censored. .
>How did Q know that POTUS would be censored/Twitter removed…years in advance?
When Q wrote twitter removed, Trump's twitter had already been taken down by 'mistake' so it was hardly a prediction
>How did Q know 'Guardians' would be a critical name in the upcoming Space Force…years in advance?
When Q wrote 'Guardians of intelligence' there was absolutely nothing connecting it to Space Force. You are seeing what you want to see, making things up, fabricating.
>…Tippy Top?
Q never uttered this phrase. POTUS, like anyone, has access to chans
>…We're not gonna take it?
What does this even mean/prove
>Individually, any one of these "coincidences" would raise an eyebrow.
Bullshit - see above
>I'm sure more diligent anons can name a few more, so if CM was Q, he was someone on the inside and around POTUS - a lot.
Nope