Shock poll: Trump 'Patriot Party' would win almost quarter of voters, drop GOP to third place

I think this poll is shit, it's to scare people so there's no conservative party, further since POTUS got 80 million votes, then it's more than the amount of democrats that would vote, here we go suppression polls coming out

Trump third party crushes GOP among highly motivated "very conservative voters" — but would leave Democrats entrenched as dominant party in national politics.Wattenberg

A hypothetical "Patriot Party" led by former President Donald Trump would win the support of almost a quarter — 23% — of the electorate, bumping the GOP down to third place with just 17%, according to a new Just the News poll with Scott Rasmussen.

The startling survey result comes amid reports that Senate Republican support for convicting Trump in an impeachment trial is fast eroding.

A Trump third party could provoke a pivotal realignment in American politics. With the support of 46% of registered voters in the new poll, Democrats would reap the benefits of a fractured opposition and entrench themselves as the nation's dominant party — even without majority support.

Image

Just the News Poll, Republican, Patriot Party or Democrat

Just the News Daily Poll

RMG Research

Among "very conservative" voters — who make up a disproportionately large bloc within the Republican primary electorate — a Trump Patriot Party crushes the GOP 55%-24%. Should Trump remain in the GOP, his wide lead among these highly motivated voters affords him great leverage to influence the direction of the party by wielding the threat of conservative primary challenges against establishment Republicans ill at ease with the former president's combative brew of conservatism infused with populism and nationalism.

Despite Trump's outperformance in 2020 of recent GOP presidential candidates among minorities, African-American and Hispanic voters effectively split evenly between the GOP and a Patriot Party in the the new poll.

The survey of 1,200 registered voters was conducted by Scott Rasmussen using a mixed-mode approach from Jan. 21-23, 2021.

Click here to see the poll's cross-demographic tabulations.

Click here to see the poll's methodology and sample demographics.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/shock-poll-trump-patriot-party-would-win-almost-quarter-voters-drop-gop

Shock poll: Trump 'Patriot Party' would win almost quarter of voters, drop GOP to third place

I think this poll is shit, it's to scare people so there's no conservative party, further since POTUS got 80 million votes, then it's more than the amount of democrats that would vote, here we go suppression polls coming out

Trump third party crushes GOP among highly motivated "very conservative voters" — but would leave Democrats entrenched as dominant party in national politics.Wattenberg

A hypothetical "Patriot Party" led by former President Donald Trump would win the support of almost a quarter — 23% — of the electorate, bumping the GOP down to third place with just 17%, according to a new Just the News poll with Scott Rasmussen.

The startling survey result comes amid reports that Senate Republican support for convicting Trump in an impeachment trial is fast eroding.

A Trump third party could provoke a pivotal realignment in American politics. With the support of 46% of registered voters in the new poll, Democrats would reap the benefits of a fractured opposition and entrench themselves as the nation's dominant party — even without majority support.

Image

Just the News Poll, Republican, Patriot Party or Democrat

Just the News Daily Poll

RMG Research

Among "very conservative" voters — who make up a disproportionately large bloc within the Republican primary electorate — a Trump Patriot Party crushes the GOP 55%-24%. Should Trump remain in the GOP, his wide lead among these highly motivated voters affords him great leverage to influence the direction of the party by wielding the threat of conservative primary challenges against establishment Republicans ill at ease with the former president's combative brew of conservatism infused with populism and nationalism.

Despite Trump's outperformance in 2020 of recent GOP presidential candidates among minorities, African-American and Hispanic voters effectively split evenly between the GOP and a Patriot Party in the the new poll.

The survey of 1,200 registered voters was conducted by Scott Rasmussen using a mixed-mode approach from Jan. 21-23, 2021.

Click here to see the poll's cross-demographic tabulations.

Click here to see the poll's methodology and sample demographics.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/shock-poll-trump-patriot-party-would-win-almost-quarter-voters-drop-gop

>>12716229 Justthenews: "In secretly recorded talks with informer Stefan Halper, Carter Page dispelled key Russia collusion allegations before FISA warrant was even approved."

• But perhaps most significant is Page's flat denial that he never met in July 2016 in Russia with two key sanctioned officials — oil executive Igor Sechin and Russian Federation official Igor Diveykin. Page's contact with the two men was alleged in both the Steele dossier and the FBI's FISA warrant application dated Oct. 21, 2016, just four days after Halper's interactions.

• Page acknowleged to Halper that he knew Sechin worked for Roseneft, but insisted he never met the Russian executive. He added he didn't even recognize Diveykin's name.

• "There's another guy I had never even heard of, you know, he's like in the inner circle," Page is quoted in the transcript as telling Halper. "I can't even remember. It's just so outrageous."

• Page stated during the conversation that his lawyers told him there was nothing illegal if he had met with the two men provided he didn't take anything from them, "even a pen." Halper prodded further, only to be shut down again by Page.

• "So they're claiming you met with these two guys and you're saying it's perfectly legal to do," Halper asked.

• Page answered: "Even if I had — which I didn't do by the way," Page answered.

• It has been known since December 2019 that Halper recorded conversations with Page that were considered exculpatory and never turned over to the FISA court. The Justice Department inspector general concluded the failure to disclose the material to the judges was a major failure of the FBI's Russia probe.

• But the exact details of Halper's conversations with Page have remained shrouded from public view until well after the Nov. 3, 2020 election, much to the consternation of conservatives and Republicans who wanted to make more of the Russia collusion false narrative during last year's election.

• Contacted Monday night about the newly declassified transcripts, Page said he believed they exonerated him and that it was unfortunate that the memos were kept hidden for four years after the Steele dossier was leaked and impugned his name unfairly as a traitor."

• The memo containing the partial transcript of the Halper-Page meeting was dated Nov. 16, 2017, but the inspector general's report makes clear the conversation actually took place on Oct. 17, 2016, or four days before the FISA warrant was approved by the FISC authorizing surveillance of Page on unspecified charges of Foreign Agent Registration Act violations involving Russia.

• Kevin Brock, the retired FBI assistant director for intelligence who helped fashion the current rules governing the bureau's use of confidential human sources, said he could not understand how the bureau proceeded with a FISA warrant against Page after the spontaneous admission of innocence,

• "There is certainly nothing in here that establishes probable cause for a FISA," Brock told Just the News. "And quite frankly there's really not even enough in here to keep the FARA case going."

• "If I'm a supervisor on a counterintelligence squad, which I once was, I'd say close this sucker down, we are wasting time," Brock continued. "It's not just the absence of probable cause for a FISA, it's also that the conversation indicates the target does not have guilty knowledge in all the paths that the confidential source was trying to lead him down."

• Brock added that at the very least the FBI had a legal obligation to disclose to the FISA judges the statements of innocence made by Page. "One hundred percent this conversation should have been disclosed to the FISA court," he said.

• The newly declassified transcripts add to an overwhelming body of evidence that the FBI knew that Page was not a legitimate target for a Russia collusion probe and instead had been working for the CIA as an asset helping the U.S. to spy on Moscow.

• Remarkably, the FBI documents declassified by Trump state the FBI planned to drop its interest in Page if Halper's undercover work did not get the Trump adviser to admit to collusion.

• "If CD [Page] does not provide tangible information during the meeting of if CD explicitly states he does not know of any RF [Russian Federation] involvement in the campaign, the FBI will focus on a second target of the investigation," stated an Aug. 24, 2016 "operational plan" for Halper's interactions with Page.

>>12718672

sauce

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/declassified-russia-informant-transcript-fbi-didnt-want

>>12715619 Anon reminder: Potus told us there was going to be a retreat. Then we win

This has been bugging me for a while. If POTUS had to step away so that what was going to happen he couldn't be seen directing it, what about Bill Barr?

-He didn't actually resign, just like POTUS didn't concede

-Would he have had to step away the same as POTUS

-Especially if this is a whole PSYOPS, and who better to plan and conduct one then an old time spook, perhaps turned patriot?

I go back and forth on Barr, and yeah I don't believe the quotes in the MSM on him placing blame on POTUS to some degree, but I can see how he was instructed to do make these statements, just like he made the statements there was no election fraud that was significant.

1. Think about it Barr was out there for MONTHS AND MONTHS stating there will be massive election fraud from the unlimited and illegal mail in ballots. He also talked about ballots printed in foreign countries.

2. As head of DOJ and ex spook he had all the information that was out there, he was sounding the bugle of alarm for months and months.

It made no sense that he all of sudden said the DOJ hasn't seen significant election fraud, I wouldn't be surprised if he was in the SCIF watching it happen.

I go back and forth on Barr, but the one thing I remember vividly when Barr was asked at his confirmation hearing, why do you want this job, 'to do the right thing', he hands were no longer tied by political people or concerns.

This may be a wacky theory, but none crazier than what we are experiencing now

Senator Durbin: why do you want this job?

General Barr. Well, because I love the Department and all

its components, including the FBI. I think they are critical

institutions that are essential to preserving the rule of law,

which is the heartbeat of this country. And I would like to

think that there was bipartisan consensus when I was last in

this position that I acted with independence and

professionalism and integrity, and I had very strong and

productive relationships across the aisle, which were

important, I think, to trying to get some things done.

And I feel that I am in a position in life where I can

provide the leadership necessary to protect the independence

and the reputation of the Department and serve in this

administration.

General Barr. That is right, Senator. One of the reasons I

ultimately decided that I would accept this position if it was

offered to me was because I was–I feel that I am in a position

to be independent. You know, over the years a lot of people

have–some politicians have called me up saying, you know, ``I

am thinking of going for the Attorney General position in this

administration,'' and so forth. And I would say, ``You are

crazy, because if you view yourself as having a political

future down the road, do not take the job, because if you take

this job, you have to be ready to make decisions and spend all

your political capital and have no future because you have to

do–you have to have that freedom of action.'' ==And I feel I am

in a position in life where I can do the right thing and not

really care about the consequences== in the sense that I do not–I can truly be independent.

https://www.congress.gov/116/chrg/CHRG-116shrg36846/CHRG-116shrg36846.htm

>>12718979 Thanks, I'm sure there is a lot more to that, but that's a great answer