Anonymous ID: c125f7 May 2, 2018, 8:04 a.m. No.1272146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2174 >>2213

>>1272076

 

Before Feb, we were told to wind the clock. Feb 8th, I think, Q said to activate the clock. Between Q drops and Potus tweets, anons figured out the clock went back 111 days. Which fits in perfectly with the 1111 theme.

 

Predicting outcomes 111 days in advance is tricky. SO, understand sometimes time adjustments are necessary.

Anonymous ID: c125f7 May 2, 2018, 8:12 a.m. No.1272192   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2220

>>1272174

 

Wow, reading comprehension skills need work.

 

>Before Feb, we were told to wind the clock. Feb 8th, I think, Q said to activate the clock. Between Q drops and Potus tweets, anons figured out the clock went back 111 days.

Is that really hard to understand where 111 days comes from?

The 11.11 theme is Nov 11th, we declared we are going to have a grand military parade.

Anonymous ID: c125f7 May 2, 2018, 8:29 a.m. No.1272311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2341

>>1272220

 

Apologies for the rudeness. Too many shills today.

 

From the end of Oct to Feb 18th, Q said "wind the clock". On Feb 18th, Q said

Feb 18 2018 21:11:55 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo 107

GO WITH GOD.

THE CLOCK IS ACTIVATED.

Q

If I remember correctly, Potus tweeted something and it linked back 111 days. The events of those drops from 111 in the past were very relevant to the current happenings.

 

No, Q never said it was 111 days, but do you think he really can? Again, it is not always 100% accurate, but it is damn close. Days are sometimes adjusted. But previous clues have been very relevant to the days happening.

 

Hope this answers your question.

Anonymous ID: c125f7 May 2, 2018, 8:34 a.m. No.1272358   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1272280

 

It's approx. and only some of the drops are relevant currently. Some things Q posts are not even meant for us. Some things are only relevant to the current situation and somethings are relevant to 111 days in the future.

I guess this could technically be considered a form of time travel? kek

Anonymous ID: c125f7 May 2, 2018, 8:37 a.m. No.1272386   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1272353

 

It's not a big deal if you read the article. It's been done before by the same judge. And Iran is not expected to pay. They laugh it off , like always.

 

The important part is who brought the lawsuit?

Anonymous ID: c125f7 May 2, 2018, 8:41 a.m. No.1272432   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2522

>>1272341

 

Sorry, I don't remember. It was an extremely busy period of digging multiple crumbs. One anon made the actual connection. I wish his post had been preserved. It took some time for it to be proven somewhat accurate. You could look at Potus archived tweets from the 18th and maybe find the connection yourself. Trying to find the bread might be damn near impossible. I was actually here when anon first posted it. Breads were going fast and it was easily missed.